Rhythms and time signatures

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pulcinella
    Host
    • Feb 2014
    • 10926

    #16
    Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
    There's a story I remember hearing a long time ago about the difficulties orchestras were (apocryphally) experiencing in performing Walton's "Portsmouth Point" overture, which (as I understand it) is written in sequences of bars of differing time signatures. So, as a result, Walton's friend, the composer Constant Lambert, "successfully" came up with a version of the same work written in 4/4 time throughout! Having heard the two versions side-by-side - I think it may well have been on a COTW that twinned Lambert and Rawsthorne - I have to say that there is a perceptible difference in feeling between the two versions - to the detriment of the original in the form of the revision!

    Is it also the case that someone came up with a similar idea for "The Rite of Spring"?
    Yes: the composer!


    According to Eric Walter White:

    The opening bars of the Sacrificial Dance were originally
    3/16 5/16 3/16 4/16 5/16 3/16 4/16
    Some years later they were changed to
    3/16 2/16 3/16 3/16 2/8 2/16 3/16 3/16 2/8

    White then goes on to say:

    In the 1943 revision, the note values were augmented for greater ease of reading, and certain bars were changed to prevent the barring from coinciding with the phrasing:
    3/8 3/8 2/8 3/8 2/4 3/8 2/8 3/8 2/4

    Comment

    • Serial_Apologist
      Full Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 37682

      #17
      Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
      Yes: the composer!


      According to Eric Walter White:

      The opening bars of the Sacrificial Dance were originally
      3/16 5/16 3/16 4/16 5/16 3/16 4/16
      Some years later they were changed to
      3/16 2/16 3/16 3/16 2/8 2/16 3/16 3/16 2/8

      White then goes on to say:

      In the 1943 revision, the note values were augmented for greater ease of reading, and certain bars were changed to prevent the barring from coinciding with the phrasing:
      3/8 3/8 2/8 3/8 2/4 3/8 2/8 3/8 2/4
      Thanks for that, Pulc. Interesting that the decision was to prevent coinciding. I need to mull over the implications of that.

      Comment

      • Pulcinella
        Host
        • Feb 2014
        • 10926

        #18
        Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
        Thanks for that, Pulc. Interesting that the decision was to prevent coinciding. I need to mull over the implications of that.
        I wasn't too sure what that meant!

        Presumably that he didn't want an accent in some places where naturally the first beat of a bar might lead you to assume that there would be one?

        White goes further:

        Reduced to its simplest statement the metre of this passage is
        3 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 2 or
        3 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 2

        Does that help?

        Comment

        • Serial_Apologist
          Full Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 37682

          #19
          Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
          I wasn't too sure what that meant!

          Presumably that he didn't want an accent in some places where naturally the first beat of a bar might lead you to assume that there would be one?

          White goes further:

          Reduced to its simplest statement the metre of this passage is
          3 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 2 or
          3 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 2

          Does that help?
          P...............ossibly

          Comment

          Working...
          X