Originally posted by Tony
View Post
Mozart PC No 27
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostI'm not sure how many people you're blaming but - hey - its a risk that all Forumistas have to face regularly. If I'm among those responsible, can I just say 'it's a pleasure to have been of assistance'
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tony View Postindeed; the marketing was absolutely truthful.
I am still awestruck by the fact that Mozart wrote these 6 concertos all in the same year.
I played horn on all those recordings in 1973 ( but I have no memory of #10 being recorded in those sessions).
Peter Serkin was, as I recall, totally superb and inspiring to 'accompany', speaking as an orchestral player.
'Sasha' Schneider was, unfortunately, less inspiring in a practical sense, but somehow got results despite his frankly rudimentary conducting technique. What was amusing was that the 'legendary' record producer, Max Wilcox, needed to ask Mr Schneider several times not to 'sniff' so loudly on his upbeats (just like George Szell!).
The ECO in those days operated a 'co-ordinated principal' system, but on these particular sessions, their woodwind principals comprised the superb line-up of Richard Adeney, flute, Neil Black, oboe, and Martin Gatt, bassoon.
After these inspirational sessions I very much regretted that we didn't continue the project; it would have been wonderful to hear what Peter Serkin would have done with e.g. KK 466, 467, 482, 488, 491, 503 etc.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostWhen you say “sniff”, is that Musician Jargon for something else, or do you literally man the respitory action?"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostShould you be interested in hearing K595 played on the sort of instruments the composer would have been familiar with, try Brautigam/Willens:
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sir Velo View PostSome of the tempi, particularly in the slow movement, suggest that the recording sessions were strictly time constrained - certainly no hint of a mawkish, valedictory reading of this sublime music! However, Brautigam is a formidable pianist with technique to burn so well worth hearing. For a more "traditional" view I would plump for Bilson/Gardiner.
Both are really fine. Personal preference for the Sonronitsky with its more forward piano ...
Comment
-
-
A problem with this piece is that some interpreters apparently want to convey that it is somehow valedictory and requires slow tempi, especially in the central movement. Yet Mozart probably drafted it in 1788 and could hardly have known that it would be his last piano concerto even when he performed it.
The slow movement is marked Larghetto and is in cut time (2 in a bar) - in other words the composer wants a fairly slow minim beat. He doesn't get that from Schnabel, whose tempo is so slow that it would be beyond the sustaining power of Mozart's pianos. Curzon/Britten and Gilels/Bohm are on the slow side: Haskil/Fricsay, Perahia and Goode are reasonably flowing. But Brautigam (fortepiano) has the courage to do it in what I think of as the proper tempo.
The first movement also suffers at the hands of Curzon and Gilels (yes, I know they were both great artists) - it's on the slow side for a Mozart Allegro.
I think I shall buy the Brautigam and hang on to Haskil, Goode and Perahia!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by rauschwerk View PostA problem with this piece is that some interpreters apparently want to convey that it is somehow valedictory and requires slow tempi, especially in the central movement. Yet Mozart probably drafted it in 1788 and could hardly have known that it would be his last piano concerto even when he performed it.
The slow movement is marked Larghetto and is in cut time (2 in a bar) - in other words the composer wants a fairly slow minim beat. He doesn't get that from Schnabel, whose tempo is so slow that it would be beyond the sustaining power of Mozart's pianos. Curzon/Britten and Gilels/Bohm are on the slow side: Haskil/Fricsay, Perahia and Goode are reasonably flowing. But Brautigam (fortepiano) has the courage to do it in what I think of as the proper tempo.
The first movement also suffers at the hands of Curzon and Gilels (yes, I know they were both great artists) - it's on the slow side for a Mozart Allegro.
I think I shall buy the Brautigam and hang on to Haskil, Goode and Perahia!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostDazzled not by the sound but the performances K365 and K595 - Curzon/Barenboim/ECO -1979 Prom on BBC Legends - found in a charity shop . There was a pile of Legends CDs but found I had all the other 7 or 8.
Comment
-
Comment