Originally posted by jayne lee wilson
View Post
April 2020 Gramophone
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostI have the Horenstein Mahler 3 in a Scribendum box, having previously had the Unicorn CD, but have to confess I've not got round to listening to it yet. It does say digitally re-mastered but I'm guessing it is the same as the Unicorn issue.
On the wider issue of reviews and reviewing, bearing in mind JLW's comments here and on the VPO/Brahms thread, I have to say that, despite subscribing to Gramophone, I take less and less notice of the reviews as I get older. Like JLW, I, too, learnt an immense amount from Richard Osborne, Robert Layton, Edward Greenfield and all the rest from both Gramophone and the Penguin guides and remain eternally grateful.
Nowadays, I prefer to make my own mind up and celebrate the differences between rival interpretations. On the VPO/Brahms thread I think that Bernstein's Brahms 3 was dismissed as sluggish and in days of old I'd have not bothered with it (probably financial reasons played a part too!). Bernstein was a great musician and I'm now much more likely to want to buy it to hear what Lenny had to say and why he did it in the way he did.
I once went to an illustrated talk on the Elgar 2 given by Edward Greenfield at the RFH and simply could not believe how LOUD he played the excerpts, seriously at hearing damage level, and I think that might well have been the moment when I rather started to have doubts about reviewers.
And I concur completely with your Bernstein sentiments—anything that he did is worth hearing
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostAn enticing looking set. However, the QOBUZ listing has Horenstein spending but 2 seconds on the opening movement of the 1st Symphony (wrongly given the soubriquet "Titan").
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostVery weird
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostTurns out several other 'tracks' in that set on QOBUZ also only last 2 seconds. Fortunately, the Mahler 3 is complete (including the applause at the end of Part 1, though it is faded out a little bluntly).
https://www.qobuz.com/gb-en/album/ja.../ocl0xww66893a
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post...as noted in #2, #6 above.....
Comment
-
-
It's available on Naxos Music Library** as well - with the PDF. As you say, the booklet contains the basic detail and a couple of pages of background.
** Profil Label, under "H" on the label listing - "Horenstein"
Naxos M Lib : http://www.for3.org/forums/showthrea...-library/page2
Comment
-
-
So can I ask...what is the verdict amongst Forumites reading this thread on Horenstein as a Mahlerian? He was active in the U.K. In his last years and some of you probably had greater experience with him than here, where he was a cult figure that has slowly gained in prominence through the decades. How did he compare with Mahlerians of his time (Bernstein, Walter, Haitink, Abravanel)
and how would he fare with the generations since?
Comment
-
-
I love his Albert Hall Eighth despite the rather crumbly sound - it is the recording that makes me think most highly of the work .
The Third and Sixth are both very fine but my favourite Horenstein Mahler is his recording of the First Symphony - up there with Barbirolli ,Kubelik and Walter for me.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostI love his Albert Hall Eighth despite the rather crumbly sound - it is the recording that makes me think most highly of the work .
The Third and Sixth are both very fine but my favourite Horenstein Mahler is his recording of the First Symphony - up there with Barbirolli ,Kubelik and Walter for me.
Comment
-
Comment