Originally posted by MickyD
View Post
Schubert. 'Great' Symphony in C Major.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MickyD View PostI don't seem to recall the fillers - the Rosamunde music and the two overtures in the Italian style - being included in the compilations, am I right, Bryn? In which case the single discs are the only way to get them.
[ ... have just spent some £7 acquiring these two CDs, obviously...]
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MickyD View PostI don't seem to recall the fillers - the Rosamunde music and the two overtures in the Italian style - being included in the compilations, am I right, Bryn? In which case the single discs are the only way to get them.(The 40CD BRILLIANT box - which has many, many excellent performances, and cost me £12 ten years ago).
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... I think you're right : they're on the individual CDs of 3 & 5 and of 8 - they don't seem to have been transferred to the various box set incarnations :
[ ... have just spent some £7 acquiring these two CDs, obviously...]
.
Comment
-
-
I'm not fussed about repeats in this, as long as I can listen to Beecham and his RPO, a recording which many people (the critic David Cairns for one) had hoped would surface one day. Character, phrasing, elan. (RFH, 14 Dec 1955).
sorry to veer OTLast edited by Keraulophone; 13-06-19, 21:34.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Keraulophone View PostI'm not fussed about repeats in this, as long as I can listen to Beecham and his RPO, a recording which many people (the critic David Cairns for one) had hoped would surface one day. Character, phrasing, elan. (RFH, 14 Dec 1955).
sorry to veer OT
Comment
-
-
I too am fussed about repeats. In most instances in sonata form movements, I’m relieved when they’re omitted. They’re a structural anomaly, harking back to short minuets, in which repeats made sense, rather than for padding out longer works. I too am fussed about repeats. In most instances in sonata form movements, I’m relieved when they’re omitted. They’re a structural anomaly, harking back to short minuets, in which repeats made sense, rather than for padding out longer works.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BBMmk2 View PostI think the Philharmonia, with Sir Charles Mackerras observes all the repeats.
I did however have a reservation concerning observation of repeats. Mackerras made the repeats in both outer movements but in the third movement he repeated only the brief first part of the scherzo first time round and the short first part of the trio. In the Philharmonia performance we hear every repeat that Schubert indicated. This means that the elegant design of the symphony is now properly represented. What I hear now satisfies my craving for classical form but it also throws up a conundrum because reviews on this site of the two concert performances suggest (I am sure totally accurately) that Mackerras was not so generous with repeats at the actual concerts.
Only the first of these performances (10 June 2006) is documented in the booklet. The performance on the 20th, as reviewed by Douglas Cooksey, mentions that microphones were also present on that occasion and that Mackerras also omitted the exposition repeat in the first movement. Colin Anderson, in reviewing the earlier performance, the one cited as being issued on this Signum release, went further and informed that neither of the outer movements had repeats observed and that Mackerras reprised only the first half of the scherzo but took them all in the trio.
If this Signum recording is of that live performance, where have those three additional repeats come from? The sceptical might suggest that they had been created by re-using existing material – this is not unknown in the recording world – but even that could not account for the appearance on the recording of Schubert's four first-time bars in the finale, which would not have been played at the concert unless the repeat was observed.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Mention of concert performances associated with Mackerras recordings is interesting: the Virgin release (OAE) says
A performance of this work took place on 10th October, 1987 in the Queen Elizabeth Hall, London, and was sponsored by Phoenix Securities Limited and the Arts Council of Great Britain.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostMention of concert performances associated with Mackerras recordings is interesting: the Virgin release (OAE) says
A performance of this work took place on 10th October, 1987 in the Queen Elizabeth Hall, London, and was sponsored by Phoenix Securities Limited and the Arts Council of Great Britain.
Now listening to Harnoncourt conduct the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostMention of concert performances associated with Mackerras recordings is interesting: the Virgin release (OAE) says
A performance of this work took place on 10th October, 1987 in the Queen Elizabeth Hall, London, and was sponsored by Phoenix Securities Limited and the Arts Council of Great Britain.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostJust to clarify: the Virgin release is not the concert performance. The recording details are simply Abbey Road Studios, London, October 1987.
Comment
-
Comment