"Universalism" and "Imperialism" - how does Music "spread"?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MrGongGong
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 18357

    #76
    Originally posted by doversoul1 View Post
    Can you think of any equivalent from non-Western music? If you are happy, clap you hands is originally a Japanese pop song but is composed in the western scale.
    Isn't this "universal" ?



    Or this ?

    Famous traditional classic music of Japan; Koto strings. "Sakura(cherry blossoms)" My other channel : https://www.youtube.com/user/stratocasterbob

    Comment

    • doversoul1
      Ex Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 7132

      #77
      Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
      I very much doubt that the majority of world population will recognise this work/performance as music in the first place. In that sense, yes, it is universal.

      For the second, compare and contrast
      video, sharing, camera phone, video phone, free, upload


      The Sakura usuelly performed now is a set of variations composed in 1923 by Michio Miyagi. Yes, the tune is well known but isn’t it know as something, a label, of Japan rather than a piece of music?

      Comment

      • MrGongGong
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 18357

        #78
        Originally posted by doversoul1 View Post
        I very much doubt that the majority of world population will recognise this work/performance as music in the first place. In that sense, yes, it is universal.
        I'm not sure whether it is important whether a "majority" recognise it as "music" or not.

        For the second, compare and contrast
        video, sharing, camera phone, video phone, free, upload


        The Sakura usuelly performed now is a set variations composed in 1923 by Michio Miyagi. Yes, the tune is well known but isn’t it know as something, a label of Japan rather than a piece of music?
        Interesting, I hear it as a piece of music rather than a "soundmark" of Japan.


        I've just returned from North East Scotland where we did a performance of South Indian lullabies in a fairly remote location with a mix of field recordings of the sea and collected voices from local communities. Interesting that when we went into a Primary school to collect material and do a small performance the Indian Shrutibox I was using to generate the drone was immediately recognised as "like the drones on the pipes". So a group of 8-year-olds lay on the floor listening to Carnatic singing with a bit of live electronics and recordings of the weather with no "boredom" or "problem" at all.

        Comment

        • doversoul1
          Ex Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 7132

          #79
          Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
          I'm not sure whether it is important whether a "majority" recognise it as "music" or not.
          If something is not recognised as music, how can it be an example for music being universal?

          Interesting, I hear it as a piece of music rather than a "soundmark" of Japan
          You would. You admit on another thread that you (and many of us here) are odd ones when it comes to music.

          As for the children, they obviously thought it was much more fun than maths or English (more biggrin)

          A serious question: do the children perceive it as music? I don’t mean what they are meant to perceive.

          [ed] you've answered my question.
          Last edited by doversoul1; 18-03-19, 22:59.

          Comment

          • MrGongGong
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 18357

            #80
            Originally posted by doversoul1 View Post
            If something is not recognised as music, how can it be an example for music being universal?
            Even though many folks wouldn't give it the name "music" it still is music.
            And it probably is "universal"
            I'm much more relaxed these days about naming, I used to be very excercised about it but "sound art" works as well

            You would. You admit on another thread that you (and many of us here) are odd ones when it comes to music.
            Absolutely

            (I think I said something similar on the Education thread)

            Comment

            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
              Gone fishin'
              • Sep 2011
              • 30163

              #81
              Originally posted by doversoul1 View Post
              ... the tune is well known but isn’t it know as something, a label, of Japan rather than a piece of music?
              At the risk of moving off-topic (or away from the core) that was more-or-less my thought when you mentioned "If you're happy and you know it" and somebody else suggested "Happy Birthday to You". Their function is what has made them so renowned - neither tunes are "popular" as pieces of Music in the sense that nobody would tune into a broadcast of a concert if they knew either were going to be performed (other than in elaborate arrangements such as Stravinsky's Greetings Prelude ) - nobody would buy a recording of either, nit i=even in a charity shop sale. The tunes have different attractions than their Musical content.
              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

              Comment

              Working...
              X