The 2018 Survey of 'Classical' Music on Radio 3

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • antongould
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 8781

    #16
    Originally posted by french frank View Post
    We'll have Mr Lockley over soon saying 'With Friends Like You &c' (Don't blame the messenger!)
    When have I ever blamed you for anything ...... ?????

    Comment

    • Serial_Apologist
      Full Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 37629

      #17
      Originally posted by Suffolkcoastal View Post
      It is typical of the current R3 however that it is very selective on which women composers it chooses to promote, Lutyens [...]for example [...] hardly featured at all.
      Unsurprising given her habit of foregoing those predictable resounding dominant-tonic resolutions that so well reflect the positivity of the times we are living through.

      Thanks again Suffy, as always, for this magnificent summing up of the range of Radio 3's composer output coverage, notwithstanding that it benchmarks the continuing story of declining standards and cultural aspirations now long dominating the BBC.

      Comment

      • oddoneout
        Full Member
        • Nov 2015
        • 9152

        #18
        Originally posted by Stanfordian View Post
        What you mean the BBC R3 management don't have this data already? They certainly should!


        There are certainly some surprises for me such as Ravel being as high 11, L. Boulanger being as high as 62, F. Mendelssohn being as high as 77, Gounod only 75, Bruch only 93, Delius only 96, Beach being as high as 101, Rodrigo only 129.
        Popular in the morning schedules.....

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 30256

          #19
          Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
          Popular in the morning schedules.....
          I was suddenly struck by the BBC's official explanation for why Radio Wales had replaced R3 on FM: more people listen to Radio Wales. So, nothing to do with what you're broadcasting, everything to do with how many listeners you can attract.
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • oddoneout
            Full Member
            • Nov 2015
            • 9152

            #20
            Originally posted by french frank View Post
            I was suddenly struck by the BBC's official explanation for why Radio Wales had replaced R3 on FM: more people listen to Radio Wales. So, nothing to do with what you're broadcasting, everything to do with how many listeners you can attract.
            Well obviously...
            Like I've said before us inferior folks who listen before midday might just have some use. I'd be mildly interested to know if the purists consider that the morning schedules is the best place for Amy Beach's output; CFM write very positively about her,https://www.classicfm.com/discover-music/amy-beach/ so I imagine the answer would be in the affirmative.

            Comment

            • Serial_Apologist
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 37629

              #21
              Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
              Well obviously...
              Like I've said before us inferior folks who listen before midday might just have some use. I'd be mildly interested to know if the purists consider that the morning schedules is the best place for Amy Beach's output; CFM write very positively about her,https://www.classicfm.com/discover-music/amy-beach/ so I imagine the answer would be in the affirmative.
              Well you could I suppose describe her music as amiable and thus suitable for light morning broadcasting.

              Comment

              • Lat-Literal
                Guest
                • Aug 2015
                • 6983

                #22
                Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                Well you could I suppose describe her music as amiable and thus suitable for light morning broadcasting.
                Talk about brexit

                Comment

                • cloughie
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2011
                  • 22116

                  #23
                  Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
                  Well obviously...
                  Like I've said before us inferior folks who listen before midday might just have some use. I'd be mildly interested to know if the purists consider that the morning schedules is the best place for Amy Beach's output; CFM write very positively about her,https://www.classicfm.com/discover-music/amy-beach/ so I imagine the answer would be in the affirmative.
                  Her Gaelic Symphony would be ideal for morning scheduling but at 40 minutes we are unlikely to get more than a snippet!

                  Comment

                  • antongould
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 8781

                    #24
                    As a tangent on Rhapsody in Blue - using Andrew’s search I found that half a dozen of the plays were on Through the Night. In fact 4 of the 6 were the last piece before the Squire - twice in October ........ imaginative programming from the producer/presenter ..... ????

                    Comment

                    • cloughie
                      Full Member
                      • Dec 2011
                      • 22116

                      #25
                      Originally posted by antongould View Post
                      As a tangent on Rhapsody in Blue - using Andrew’s search I found that half a dozen of the plays were on Through the Night. In fact 4 of the 6 were the last piece before the Squire - twice in October ........ imaginative programming from the producer/presenter ..... ????
                      You’ll be telling me next the pianist was called Dawn!

                      Comment

                      • antongould
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 8781

                        #26
                        Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                        You’ll be telling me next the pianist was called Dawn!
                        Close cloughers - Les Dawson .......

                        Comment

                        • Lat-Literal
                          Guest
                          • Aug 2015
                          • 6983

                          #27
                          Suffolkcoastal

                          This again is an extraordinary piece of work - I don't know how you do it - for which thanks and appreciation are merited. There are some individual points. I am disappointed with the reduction in the Delius which I suppose might be slightly linked to the increase in RVW and am wondering if the Gipps release had the coverage it deserved. But in previous years I have taken up on your offer to ask about individual composers. I won't trouble you with that sort of request this time around. However, taking what is nearly a decade now in the round, what is striking is that the names on the list have been more or less the same from the beginning to the end. Fair enough to an extent. But what might be worthwhile doing some time - I don't know how easy this would be for you and it is entirely up to you - is to see if there are any trends in terms of shift in numbers for specific composers below the levels cited.

                          What I have in mind here is the sort of composer who might at the start of the decade have been having 1-3 pieces played every year and in the past few years might have consistently achieved, say, 15-20 or 30-40 plays. I mention this because the breadth of the station is arguably in these lower numbers but where the numbers are very small what they equate to is novelty. In contrast, somewhat higher numbers (a) enable the greater possibility of exposure at some point during the year by more people to what might be for them a new composer and (b) provide the scope for those people who listen extensively to comprehend better a relatively little heard composer so as to decide whether they wish to explore that composer in more depth. Just a thought. No problem if you can't or won't or don't want to do so. We are lucky to have had such information from you. The station should by rights find it useful too.
                          Last edited by Lat-Literal; 05-01-19, 12:45.

                          Comment

                          • Suffolkcoastal
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 3290

                            #28
                            That's no problem at all, I can easily supply the figures for any composer by year since 2009 so you can see the trends for those who regularly fall below the 50 threshold. I'm looking at the best way to show these in graph format as well, please ask away.

                            Comment

                            • pastoralguy
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 7746

                              #29
                              Fantastic work!

                              Alas, no George Lloyd!

                              Comment

                              • Suffolkcoastal
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 3290

                                #30
                                Originally posted by pastoralguy View Post
                                Fantastic work!

                                Alas, no George Lloyd!
                                The total for George Lloyd in 2018 was 4.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X