I think one of the fundamental things that seems to be missing from discourse about education (not just confined to music) is examining what it is for in the first place?
Increasingly I find that people are unwilling to discuss this when planning and setting up projects.
The NPME (National Plan for Music Education in England) didn't help at all and simply repeated a load of tired nonsense about music being a "universal language" and so on.
When I go to work in schools I always try to think about what kinds of things aren't there and what the "unique opportunity" is in any given situation.
Music education has suffered (IMV) from genre-based approaches that fail to ask questions about the contextual basis for music as a phenomenon.
Surely school (and college/university) is a place to find about about things that you wouldn't encounter elsewhere?
Increasingly I find that people are unwilling to discuss this when planning and setting up projects.
The NPME (National Plan for Music Education in England) didn't help at all and simply repeated a load of tired nonsense about music being a "universal language" and so on.
When I go to work in schools I always try to think about what kinds of things aren't there and what the "unique opportunity" is in any given situation.
Music education has suffered (IMV) from genre-based approaches that fail to ask questions about the contextual basis for music as a phenomenon.
Surely school (and college/university) is a place to find about about things that you wouldn't encounter elsewhere?
Comment