Originally posted by greenilex
View Post
New Music Genres : 1945-1981 versus 1981-2017
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostShould we all flock to wallpaper? Discuss, using cut and paste where necessary.
It has a rather cool, modern feel but I suppose I will learn to live with it.
It isn't as if it is screaming Stockhausen's rodents.
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostThank goodness for a post in this thread that I could understand!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by greenilex View PostBut if genre is mostly a matter of marketing how do music educators establish a canon to transmit to the young idea?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostThe question is: do music educators need to establish a canon? This music educator says no, and I'm sure MrGG, another music educator, will agree.
Which is to say that classical music has a need not to box itself in whereas popular styles happily self-defined before the marketing people got involved?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostThe question is: do music educators need to establish a canon? This music educator says no, and I'm sure MrGG, another music educator, will agree.
Which is NOT to say that there aren't differences or genres
but that Music Education is not necessarily concerned with "transmitting" a "canon".
It seems that the original poster seems to equate popularity with "success"
now back to this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuwIsz2qggA
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostYou beat me to it
Which is NOT to say that there aren't differences or genres
but that Music Education is not necessarily concerned with "transmitting" a "canon".
It seems that the original poster seems to equate popularity with "success"
now back to this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuwIsz2qggA
Or is it purple?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lat-Literal View PostMy Wellbeing has just gone up.
It has a rather cool, modern feel but I suppose I will learn to live with it.
It isn't as if it is screaming Stockhausen's rodents.
One out of 32 ain't bad.
'Listen in colour ... ' er, that's the old Jazz fm station ad. btw Same funky chameleon on Jazz fm's logo also appears on the Wilko paint chart for 2017 BUT without his (her?) headphones. Must be the day job, I spose
Back to the thread ... acid jazz, gypsy jazz, brass house? Have we those yet?And the tune ends too soon for us all
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Constantbee View PostNice colours LL. I'm having Cherished Gold in the hall. One of the unusual recommended pairings is with something like Mint Macaroon. Pretty but I'm not brave enough. If I get it wrong it's a lot of paint down the drain
'Listen in colour ... ' er, that's the old Jazz fm station ad. btw Same funky chameleon on Jazz fm's logo also appears on the Wilko paint chart for 2017 BUT without his (her?) headphones. Must be the day job, I spose
Back to the thread ... acid jazz, gypsy jazz, brass house? Have we those yet?
Mint Macaroon looks great in my kitchen and I did like the appearance of Cherished Gold.
But my hall is green or yellow depending on who is looking at it.
There's been fun and games with it.
Good luck with yours which hopefully will not be a party piece.
I have never heard of brass house - so interesting.
The other two are new to this thread and appropriate but don't tell Django I said so.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by greenilex View PostBut if genre is mostly a matter of marketing how do music educators establish a canon to transmit to the young idea?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lat-Literal View PostWould there, though, be a distinction in classical music?
Which is to say that classical music has a need not to box itself in whereas popular styles happily self-defined before the marketing people got involved?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lat-Literal View PostI would like to suggest that there were 10 times more new music genres in the 36 year period 1945-1981 than there were in the 36 year period 1981-2017.
Why, if true, should this have been the case?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by greenilex View PostSorry, but I think talking about the Church’s marketing strategy in the past tense is misleading...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostYou chose to split the period into two - had you chosen 1945-1969/1970-1994/1995-2018 you would have had the large number in the middle time-range, when a lot of newgenres appeared and others were designated retrospectively. When did rockabilly appear, or do wopp, heavy metal, prog rock, underground and record labels to distinguish When did pop spawn rock as distinct from rock'n'roll, folk music spawn World and fused with rock to give us folk-rock and so on and on, then there was glam rock, disco, punk and then all these dance things -when did ska develop into reggae? Some were late sixties but most 70 to 94!
I always appreciate your contributions and enjoy reading them but I don't think I can agree with you on this one.
If anything, I felt that the iffier bit of what I was saying involved not taking on board what was happening prior to 1945. Not after 1981. A term like "the folk revival" was a mechanism for pretending away much earlier folk music trends for the sake of my argument although it could be justified on the grounds that there was a distinct folk revival in the 1960s. Country too has quite a lot of background prior to 1945 as does very obviously jazz though neither in more modern styles.
To address your questions, and you know this, rock and reggae definitely have their roots in the period 1945-1981 as do their immediate predecessors. World is trickier because the marketing term which I support is by committee from the early/mid 1980s but there is enough prior to it via the popularity of Masekela and Makeba and many others for it to be rooted for western purposes in the 50s/60s. Rockabilly is also in the time period. Doo-wop too - with a few earlier roots.
Comment
-
Comment