Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte
View Post
Leonard Bernstein - The Conductor
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View Post
I see that there is a lot of love on this Forum for Bernstein’s Sibelius. One of my earliest recordings was Francescatti/Bernstein in the VC and it’s still my go to for this piece. I was therefore expecting great things when I bought the Sony Bernstein/Sibelius box but I was terribly dissatisfied after 2 playing and haven’t touched it since, but now I can’t remember why. Let’s give it another go.
Far too rich, heavy and Romantic for me. But I've a near-pathological disposition against such Sibelius - none too fond of Berlin PO/Rattle or the Batiashvili/Barenboim Violin Concerto either....
His Nielsen is a bit of a mixed bag for me for similar reasons, but I did get some pleasure out of the 2nd - and, though I've not revisited it in years and might find it overpowering (in the wrong way) now, I accept the NYPO 5th as something of classic: it certainly overwhelmed me off borrowed vinyl back in the day - along with the polar-opposite Bournemouth SO/Berglund, it was one of the recordings I discovered, and learned to love, Nielsen from.
I wonder if Bernstein ever did the 6th in concert? That might have suited him better.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
His Nielsen is a bit of a mixed bag for me for similar reasons, but I did get some pleasure out of the 2nd - and, though I've not revisited it in years and might find it overpowering (in the wrong way) now, I accept the NYPO 5th as something of classic: it certainly overwhelmed me off borrowed vinyl back in the day - along with the polar-opposite Bournemouth SO/Berglund, it was one of the recordings I discovered, and learned to love, Nielsen from.
I wonder if Bernstein ever did the 6th in concert? That might have suited him better.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Darkbloom View PostHis 3rd is very enjoyable too. He manages to catch the right balance in the first movement and there's a genuine sense of good humour about it, where others (like Blomstedt) can be a bit tense and humourless. The 4th is the only real misfire in that set, for some reason it never takes off.
I'm not sure, either, that "good humour", whilst often a part of Nielsen's expression, is the most essential or definitive mood in reference to the wide-ranging, energised, fantastical, imaginative creation that is the Allegro Expansivo of Nielsen's Symphony No.3!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lat-Literal View PostWhat, I am wondering, about Bernstein and........Mahler?
I thought he was highly regarded for it?
Tom Service is telling me that Mahler's symphonies are pop music.
That I need to place myself in them for their fullest appreciation.
Perhaps Bernstein's lighter West Side Story side helps with that sort of angle?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09h64g4
(Incidentally, if I had to choose just one on the basis of what I know, I reckon it is Mahler 2 but I would be prepared to reassess in a reasonable context)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostYou're not alone - having recalled my enjoyment of at least some (1 & 5 IIRC) of the earlier Sony Release years before, I bought the 2015 remaster and disliked it so much I sent it back...
Far too rich, heavy and Romantic for me. But I've a near-pathological disposition against such Sibelius - none too fond of Berlin PO/Rattle or the Batiashvili/Barenboim Violin Concerto either....
His Nielsen is a bit of a mixed bag for me for similar reasons, but I did get some pleasure out of the 2nd - and, though I've not revisited it in years and might find it overpowering (in the wrong way) now, I accept the NYPO 5th as something of classic: it certainly overwhelmed me off borrowed vinyl back in the day - along with the polar-opposite Bournemouth SO/Berglund, it was one of the recordings I discovered, and learned to love, Nielsen from.
I wonder if Bernstein ever did the 6th in concert? That might have suited him better.
I just played the Berglund Nielsen 5 for the first time yesterday.,Having purchased the Berglund Icon box. I liked it but the real jolting recording for me remains Horenstein
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostThere has been quite a discussion about Bernstein conducting Mahler in the BAL thread for Mahler Seventh. I gues some of us felt it would be redundant to restate our positions here
I will have a look at that thread.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostBut which Blomstedt? The Danish RSO and the SFSO recordings of both No.3 and No.4 are very different (personally, very much prefer the Danish RSO ones ...).
I'm not sure, either, that "good humour", whilst often a part of Nielsen's expression, is the most essential or definitive mood in reference to the wide-ranging, energised, fantastical, imaginative creation that is the Allegro Expansivo of Nielsen's Symphony No.3!
The SF one. I agree that the Danish recordings are much better. I had the first movement in mind mainly. I'm still sticking by 'good humoured', at least when it comes to the outer movements. Even though it's more complicated than that, it still seems like the most robust and approachable of his symphonies.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lat-Literal View PostWhat, I am wondering, about Bernstein and........Mahler?
I thought he was highly regarded for it?
Tom Service is telling me that Mahler's symphonies are pop music.
That I need to place myself in them for their fullest appreciation.
Perhaps Bernstein's lighter West Side Story side helps with that sort of angle?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09h64g4
(Incidentally, if I had to choose just one on the basis of what I know, I reckon it is Mahler 2 but I would be prepared to reassess in a reasonable context)Don’t cry for me
I go where music was born
J S Bach 1685-1750
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostYou are right, Lat=Lit. Bernstein was very highly regarded for his Mahler interpretations. Look at the wealth of experience he had when he recorded his cycle for DG! I bet there were not many conductors with that amount behind him?
I think I read that he wasn't especially keen on Bruckner but I don't know if that is true.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostWell he didn't record much!Don’t cry for me
I go where music was born
J S Bach 1685-1750
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostIf any!
I'm still going through that marvellous box set, I mentioned earlier. There are two cycle of LvB's symphonies in there!!! One in Vienna, the other in Boston![FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostThe Ninth Symphony - with the NYPO (CBS/SONY) and with the VPO (DG).
Really???!!! I knew he'd recorded the Seventh Live in Boston at his last ever concert - and IIRC, there's a Boston Fifth (with Serkin in the Emperor - one of LB's very first recordings for DG) - but a complete cycle?
Here it is
Symphony No.7(Boston SO)
Symphonies Nos 5 & 9: Bavarian RSO.
Many thanks for reminding me, Ferney!Don’t cry for me
I go where music was born
J S Bach 1685-1750
Comment
-
Comment