Originally posted by Lat-Literal
View Post
Parry and Stanford
Collapse
X
-
I've just finished reading (for the nth time) Love Lies Bleeding, by Edmund Crispin (Bruce Montgomery). It features nasty goings-on during a Shakepeare play jointly put on by a boys' and a girls' public school. The Headmaster of one is Dr. Stanford; the Headmistress of the other, Miss Parry.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostHmmm, couldn't find it this?
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post"[T]his Sunday" means "this coming Sunday" - or "next Sunday", if you prefer - as opposed to "this Sunday just gone"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09w6xwyDon’t cry for me
I go where music was born
J S Bach 1685-1750
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lat-Literal View PostI would be interested to hear opinions on the respective merits of these composers, music of theirs which stands up today, and any potential for reassessment beside or against Elgar.
Sir Hubert Parry: Twelve Sets of English Lyrics Volume II
Andrew West, James Gilchrist, Roderick Williams, Sarah Fox
Comment
-
-
Parry's orchestration, though extremely competent, somehow lacks imagination. It's mostly strings sawing away, with colouration from the other sections when needed. I don't suggest it isn't good, but there are missed opportunities - something clearly indicated by comparing the composer's own orchestration of Jerusalem with Elgar's rethinking, shortly afterwards.
Parry/Parry
Parry/Elgar
Comment
-
-
Interesting point, Alpie - and it's certainly true also of Best Pair of Nylons. But whilst it's true of the choral accompaniments, I don't feel the same sense of "missed opportunities" in the two purely orchestral works of his that I know best: the Fifth Symphony and the Elegy for Brahms.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostParry's orchestration, though extremely competent, somehow lacks imagination. It's mostly strings sawing away, with colouration from the other sections when needed. I don't suggest it isn't good, but there are missed opportunities - something clearly indicated by comparing the composer's own orchestration of Jerusalem with Elgar's rethinking, shortly afterwards.
Parry/Parry
Parry/Elgar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5MaLVaN6tI
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostParry's orchestration, though extremely competent, somehow lacks imagination. It's mostly strings sawing away, with colouration from the other sections when needed. I don't suggest it isn't good, but there are missed opportunities - something clearly indicated by comparing the composer's own orchestration of Jerusalem with Elgar's rethinking, shortly afterwards.
Parry/Parry
Parry/Elgar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5MaLVaN6tI
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pabmusic View PostSpot on, Alpie. It's a bit like an organ sound - unvarying. Mark you, Stanford - though more varied - can be rather bland.Don’t cry for me
I go where music was born
J S Bach 1685-1750
Comment
-
Comment