I’ve reread Wagner’s “Judaism In Music” recently. Leaving aside all of the objectionable blather, which isn’t the point that I want to discuss here, from a Musical standpoint Wagner spends a considerable amount of time damning Mendelssohn. His argument seems to be that FM wasn’t a truly original Composer, but one that aped Bach and Beethoven, producing a watered down version of both. Wagner states the last real great German Composer (he implies, before himself) was Beethoven.
I realize that from an evolutionary standpoint, Music doesn’t necessarily progress in a straight line.
Chopin, for example, stated he had little use for Beethoven and that Mozart and Italian bel canto Opera were more important to him. I had always thought however that the first Generation Of Romantic Composers (roughly, Mendelssohn,Schumann,Berlioz, Weber, Bellini and Rossini) had particularly in the areas of Harmony and Melody made such innovations that they paved the way for the later generations of Romanticists.
Listening to Mendelssohn’s Scottish Symphony yesterday I thought I detected little bits, almost embryonic Wagnerian leitmotifs, in the various movements that were all gathered up, thrillingly, in the finale. Wagner would perhaps counter that Beethoven actually did this in the 5th Symphony, where the initial 4 note theme reappears in several guises in all the movements , but it feels very different in the Scottish Symphony.
At any rate Wagner seems to dismiss FM and doesn’t seem to cite anyone after Beethoven (conspicuously omitting his own Father in Law?) as being important until he comes along, apparently springing into the world, Athena like, from the head of Beethoven. My question is therefore were the earlier Romantics indeed a necessary antecedent for Wagner to appear?
I realize that from an evolutionary standpoint, Music doesn’t necessarily progress in a straight line.
Chopin, for example, stated he had little use for Beethoven and that Mozart and Italian bel canto Opera were more important to him. I had always thought however that the first Generation Of Romantic Composers (roughly, Mendelssohn,Schumann,Berlioz, Weber, Bellini and Rossini) had particularly in the areas of Harmony and Melody made such innovations that they paved the way for the later generations of Romanticists.
Listening to Mendelssohn’s Scottish Symphony yesterday I thought I detected little bits, almost embryonic Wagnerian leitmotifs, in the various movements that were all gathered up, thrillingly, in the finale. Wagner would perhaps counter that Beethoven actually did this in the 5th Symphony, where the initial 4 note theme reappears in several guises in all the movements , but it feels very different in the Scottish Symphony.
At any rate Wagner seems to dismiss FM and doesn’t seem to cite anyone after Beethoven (conspicuously omitting his own Father in Law?) as being important until he comes along, apparently springing into the world, Athena like, from the head of Beethoven. My question is therefore were the earlier Romantics indeed a necessary antecedent for Wagner to appear?
Comment