Instruments you struggle with

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zola
    Full Member
    • May 2011
    • 656

    #61
    Originally posted by Pianoman View Post
    Yes, I note that a 'period' piano will be employed at the next Chopin competition apparently - much to the absolute horror of some...! I welcome it, as the difference in sound between most modern concert grands in minimal imo (whatever the manufacturers like to claim) and this will 'test' the musicians in a very different way. Steinway led the way with more heft, weighty tone, sheer volume, thunderous bass etc etc, not always what Chopin, or indeed Brahms, Schubert, Mendelsssohn really need..
    The "period" Chopin competition will be an additional competition in intermediate years, not a replacement for the long standing format which will continue.

    Comment

    • Pianoman
      Full Member
      • Jan 2013
      • 529

      #62
      Ah right thanks - makes sense.

      Comment

      • Eine Alpensinfonie
        Host
        • Nov 2010
        • 20572

        #63
        I don't have any problems with harpsichords (though I regret their lack of dynamic range), clavichords and straight-strung pianos. Those earlier pianos are a different matter. I see them as instruments very much on the deveopment stage. As for the argument that these were the instruments the composers wrote for, it's a compelling argument, but composers generally welcomed newer instruments as they appeared, so perhaps were not content with what they had.

        I would suggest that, in the case of Liszt, the ideal piano for his music has yet to be designed.

        Comment

        • ferneyhoughgeliebte
          Gone fishin'
          • Sep 2011
          • 30163

          #64
          Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
          I would suggest that, in the case of Liszt, the ideal piano for his music has yet to be designed.
          Joseph Cooper's Dummy Keyboard?
          [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

          Comment

          • Eine Alpensinfonie
            Host
            • Nov 2010
            • 20572

            #65
            Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
            Joseph Cooper's Dummy Keyboard?

            Comment

            • pastoralguy
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 7799

              #66
              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
              Joseph Cooper's Dummy Keyboard?
              Harsh. (But funny!)

              Comment

              • BBMmk2
                Late Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 20908

                #67
                Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                Joseph Cooper's Dummy Keyboard?
                That's going back a few years!!
                Don’t cry for me
                I go where music was born

                J S Bach 1685-1750

                Comment

                • David-G
                  Full Member
                  • Mar 2012
                  • 1216

                  #68
                  "Can you honestly prefer to hear eg Beethoven's PC4 on a fp than a concert grand?" (Cloughie)

                  Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
                  Without hesitation yes. Thinking of the evolution of instruments as consisting of "improvements" is rather akin to thinking of the evolution of music in the same way, surely. Musical styles change, and instruments are invented or developed or discarded to take account of those changes, not to play the same music "better".
                  Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                  I can, cloughie - the range of colours from that instrument makes modern instruments intended to play Rachmaninoff in Carnegie Hall sound ... well, monochrome in comparison. Getting the sound that Beethoven was more used to - as opposed to something he'd never heard - reveals so much about balance, timbre, and texture that are lost in 20th Century instruments.
                  Very well said, both!

                  Comment

                  • Eine Alpensinfonie
                    Host
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 20572

                    #69
                    Each to his/her own.

                    Comment

                    • hmvman
                      Full Member
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 1121

                      #70
                      For me, the Pedal Steel Guitar. Not a struggle just an absolute loathing. Fortunately, as far as I'm aware, no classical works have featured this abomination - yet...

                      Comment

                      • David-G
                        Full Member
                        • Mar 2012
                        • 1216

                        #71
                        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                        I don't have any problems with harpsichords (though I regret their lack of dynamic range), clavichords and straight-strung pianos. Those earlier pianos are a different matter. I see them as instruments very much on the development stage. As for the argument that these were the instruments the composers wrote for, it's a compelling argument, but composers generally welcomed newer instruments as they appeared, so perhaps were not content with what they had.
                        Certainly Haydn, Mozart and Beethoven were interested in and took advantage of the latest developments in piano design. But what you are missing is that in the development of the piano through the nineteenth century, things were lost as well as gained: clarity, tonal separation of registers, the ability to "speak" rather than to "sing", the great differences between instruments by different manufacturers. We simply cannot say that Beethoven would have welcomed with open arms the wonders of the modern Steinway, without admitting that we don't know if he wouldn't have missed the characteristics that have been lost.

                        I was privileged a couple of weeks ago to hear the opening of Beethoven's "Pathetique" sonata played on Haydn's grand piano, an English Longman & Broderip of 1795, by Alec Cobbe at Hatchlands. The sheer excitement of this performance was extraordinary - an edginess, a sense that the instrument was being played at its limits, giving more than one expected possible from a piano of this period. This, I felt, was what Beethoven was all about. The Pathetique sounds marvellous on a modern piano. But I am afraid, rather boring by comparison.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X