Order of movements in Mahler 6

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
    Gone fishin'
    • Sep 2011
    • 30163

    I understand (read "I'm sure I've read somewhere") that many studio recordings of multi-movement works were recorded over several sessions, with Movements recorded according to Sessions timetables, rather than score order. Details on CD booklets suggest that not merely were Symphony movements recorded weeks apart from their "neighbours", but that other works by other composers were recorded "in between".

    It doesn't (or hasn't yet!) affected my listening any more than knowing that "corrections" have been edited within the Movements themselves (I feel much happier with the decades-later added Horn in the Scherzo of the Barbirolli Mahler #5 than with the "authentic" original, for example). I know that lots of jiggery-pokery happens in the studio - as long as the results aren't too obvious, it doesn't "feature" in my listening.
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

    Comment

    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
      Gone fishin'
      • Sep 2011
      • 30163

      Did I just use the expression "jiggery-pokery"?


      Put me in a bath chair, cover my legs with a blanket and just let me quietly sit out in the garden ...
      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

      Comment

      • ahinton
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 16122

        Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
        Did I just use the expression "jiggery-pokery"?
        Mahler's Sixth Symphony has no jig movement and, if it did, I would't have any idea between which of its other movements it should best be placed; moreover, it calls for a large hammer rather than a poker. So whilst you did indeed use that expression, its direct relevance to the vexed and often vexing issue of the order of the middle movements of that symphpony remains well less than clear.

        Do you suppose, incidentally, that David Matthews has the order of movements in his Sixth Symphony correct or might he change it at some point?

        Comment

        • Nick Armstrong
          Host
          • Nov 2010
          • 26456

          Originally posted by ahinton View Post
          Mahler's Sixth Symphony has no jig movement and, if it did, I would't have any idea between which of its other movements it should best be placed; moreover, it calls for a large hammer rather than a poker. So whilst you did indeed use that expression, its direct relevance to the vexed and often vexing issue of the order of the middle movements of that symphpony remains well less than clear.
          A classic example of gossamer Hinton wit !!

          It's Andante - Scherzo on t'wireless at t'moment.... but without the Allegro energico or the Finale !!!!!!



          "...the isle is full of noises,
          Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
          Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
          Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

          Comment

          • Richard Barrett
            Guest
            • Jan 2016
            • 6259

            Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
            many studio recordings of multi-movement works were recorded over several sessions
            Quite. And very many "live" recordings are patched up with bits taken from the dress rehearsal. And of course it's almost always impossible to tell, if musicians and engineers are doing their job. One person's jiggery-pokery (I think you should be thanked for returning this excellent turn of phrase to circulation ) is another's practical music-making with the recording as the artistic aim.

            Comment

            • Beef Oven!
              Ex-member
              • Sep 2013
              • 18147

              Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
              Quite. And very many "live" recordings are patched up with bits taken from the dress rehearsal. And of course it's almost always impossible to tell, if musicians and engineers are doing their job. One person's jiggery-pokery (I think you should be thanked for returning this excellent turn of phrase to circulation ) is another's practical music-making with the recording as the artistic aim.
              One reason why Deep Purple's 'Made In Japan' is such an amazing album - put straight onto the LP from the gig, warts 'n' all.

              Comment

              • Bryn
                Banned
                • Mar 2007
                • 24688

                Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
                ... (I think you should be thanked for returning this excellent turn of phrase to circulation ) ...
                A cursory search of this forum reveals at least 14 earlier occurrences of the phrase, and not only from fg. [Posted in jigged up poker-face mode.]

                Comment

                • ahinton
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 16122

                  Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
                  Quite. And very many "live" recordings are patched up with bits taken from the dress rehearsal. And of course it's almost always impossible to tell, if musicians and engineers are doing their job. One person's jiggery-pokery (I think you should be thanked for returning this excellent turn of phrase to circulation ) is another's practical music-making with the recording as the artistic aim.
                  The remaining issue here, however, is that, whilst both you and fhg are indeed correct in what you write about this, the conductor presumably makes a decision on the middle movement order in the finished product whether the symphony's recorded in this piecemeal way or right through from start to finish, just as he/she will decide on the order to adopt when performing it live in front of an audience.

                  It might be interesting to hear what conductors who have performed the symphony both ways have to say about this issue.

                  Comment

                  • Bryn
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 24688

                    Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
                    Quite. And very many "live" recordings are patched up with bits taken from the dress rehearsal. ...
                    An interesting example is the 2012 HCMF 'live' recording of Feldman's For Philip Guston (Simon Allen, Carla Rees, John Tilbury) on the ATOPOS label. Carla had a particularly bad cough at the time, so much of the issued recording comes from rehearsal takes. However, it was decided that the closing section should be taken from the concert performance in order to reflect the state of near exhaustion of the performers after nigh on five hours.

                    Comment

                    • ahinton
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 16122

                      Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                      An interesting example is the 2012 HCMF 'live' recording of Feldman's For Philip Guston (Simon Allen, Carla Rees, John Tilbury) on the ATOPOS label. Carla had a particularly bad cough at the time, so much of the issued recording comes from rehearsal takes. However, it was decided that the closing section should be taken from the concert performance in order to reflect the state of near exhaustion of the performers after nigh on five hours.
                      Interesting as that is, it's not obvious what bearing it (or other similar examples) might have on the order of the middle movements in Mahler 6; given that, however it's recorded, a decision on this will have had to be taken by the conductor prior to a live performance.

                      Comment

                      • vinteuil
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 12685

                        ... I'm just a little surprised that music critics seem to find it hard to accept that there might be an unsolvable mutability as to the nature of a 'right text' here. In the parallel field of lit: crit: the tussle as to what the 'right' versions of, say, Wordsworth or Coleridge poems might be has been going on for generations - a systole/diastole between opting for 'first versions' and 'last versions' with (many) variants in between.

                        An exemplary work might be Jack Stillinger: "Coleridge & Textual Instability - the Multiple Versions of the Major Poems". *

                        Unsettling though it is, I have had to accept that there is no one 'right text' - and learn to live with - and enjoy - the fruitfulness of many possibles.

                        * http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/0195085833

                        Comment

                        • Bryn
                          Banned
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 24688

                          Originally posted by ahinton View Post
                          Interesting as that is, it's not obvious what bearing it (or other similar examples) might have on the order of the middle movements in Mahler 6; given that, however it's recorded, a decision on this will have had to be taken by the conductor prior to a live performance.
                          O.k., back on topic, Zemlinsky's piano four hands version of the symphony has, in the score available via imslp, the middle movements in the order II. Andante moderato, III. Scherzo: Wuchtig. However the only recording I have been able to find of it has the order II. Scherzo: Wuchtig, III. Andante moderato.

                          Comment

                          • vinteuil
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 12685

                            Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                            O.k., back on topic, Zemlinsky's piano four hands version of the symphony has, in the score available via imslp, the middle movements in the order II. Andante moderato, III. Scherzo: Wuchtig. However the only recording I have been able to find of it has the order II. Scherzo: Wuchtig, III. Andante moderato.
                            ... the disc I have of the piano duo Zenker/Trenkner performing the Zemlinsky transcription has the Andante followed by the Scherzo.



                            In the liner notes: " Zemlinsky's four-handed version of the symphony appeared in the same year as the orchestral premiere. Mahler had changed the original order of the movements ... for a short time when Zemlinsky produced his transcription. The Andante had been placed before the Scherzo, but the third hammer blow had not yet been eliminated from the Finale. Mahler and Zemlinsky evidently performed the piano version at Mahler's home with Arnold Schonberg in attendance (cf. Gustav Mahler, Letters nos. 349-50, Vienna, 1982)."
                            Last edited by vinteuil; 16-02-16, 14:44.

                            Comment

                            • Bryn
                              Banned
                              • Mar 2007
                              • 24688

                              Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                              ... the disc I have of the piano duo Zenker/Trenkner doing this has the Andante followed by the Scherzo.



                              ... but this is I think the Casella transcription
                              Curiouser and curiouser, cried Alice.

                              Comment

                              • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                                Gone fishin'
                                • Sep 2011
                                • 30163

                                CD versions of the first complete recording of the Sixth (Adler and the VSO in 1951) put the Scherzo third.
                                [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X