John Eliot Gardiner - the pros and cons...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Richard Barrett
    Guest
    • Jan 2016
    • 6259

    Originally posted by aeolium View Post
    My point is that the results are irrelevant. Even if it were true that the conductor bullies achieved better results (and there cannot be any objective judgement about that) the behaviour would not be justifiable.
    You're right of course. But I don't think anyone here is claiming that this behaviour in itself produces better results, no matter how subjective a matter it is.

    Moving back towards the topic, though, I guess some people might think that the discipline and precision of JEG's performances is the result of the person in change being an authoritarian. One might think the same thing about the Arditti String Quartet, with which I have plenty of first-hand experience. But for everyone who achieves discipline and precision using those methods, there's someone who achieves it without them. It's just too facile to associate a particular style of performance with a particular kind of social behaviour.

    Comment

    • ahinton
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 16122

      Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
      You're right of course. But I don't think anyone here is claiming that this behaviour in itself produces better results, no matter how subjective a matter it is.

      Moving back towards the topic, though, I guess some people might think that the discipline and precision of JEG's performances is the result of the person in change being an authoritarian. One might think the same thing about the Arditti String Quartet, with which I have plenty of first-hand experience. But for everyone who achieves discipline and precision using those methods, there's someone who achieves it without them. It's just too facile to associate a particular style of performance with a particular kind of social behaviour.
      "Facile"? Absurd, I'd say!

      Comment

      • Stanfordian
        Full Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 9302

        Originally posted by Caliban View Post
        [Re: St Matthew Passion BAL, 7.4.12]

        I must say I find Gardiner's recording far too hard-driven, theatrical rather than spiritual and hence missing the point albeit - true - extraordinary and a technical tour-de-force. Same goes for his other large-scale Bach. I tried them all when they came out, but returned them all - they left me cold and rather irritated.
        These days my experience has led me to avoid recordings by JEG. I last saw him conduct in 2014 in Mendelssohn and Schumann with LSO at Berlin and was singularly unimpressed with a really uninspiring performance of such wonderful music. In my recordings of Bach cantatas as a rule I much prefer Herreweghe, Suzuki on period instruments and for older recordings Richter.
        Last edited by Stanfordian; 11-03-17, 16:47.

        Comment

        • Richard Barrett
          Guest
          • Jan 2016
          • 6259

          Originally posted by Stanfordian View Post
          These days my experience has led me to avoid recordings by JEG. I last saw him conduct in 2014 in Mendelssohn and Schumann with LSO at Berlin and was singularly unimpressed. In my Bach cantatas as a rule I much prefer Herreweghe, Suzuki and Richter.
          I remember being in a CD shop (remember those?) browsing around and wondering what the music was that was being played. It sounded a bit like Bach but not the Bach that I knew. It turned out to be one of JEG's Archiv CDs of Bach cantatas. I like the live ones from 2000, most of them anyway, there are a couple of dodgy performances there which you'd expect, these people are only human after all. The best ones are as eloquent a testimony to the advantages of live recording as I can imagine. These days, though, I prefer to hear them with much smaller vocal ensembles than in the Harnoncourt/Leonhardt and Koopman sets that I got to know most of them through. But I don't think anyone has yet (I mean since Bach's time!) really solved the problem of how to do that convincingly.

          Comment

          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
            Gone fishin'
            • Sep 2011
            • 30163

            Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
            But I don't think anyone has yet (I mean since Bach's time!) really solved the problem of how to do that convincingly.
            I'm not sure that anyone has seriously tried to do a Cantata sequence using "O"VpP and boys and young men singers. If ever my EuroMillions come up, that would be something I would sponsor. (I hope no one's waiting - I never buy the tickets.)
            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

            Comment

            • Richard Barrett
              Guest
              • Jan 2016
              • 6259

              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
              I'm not sure that anyone has seriously tried to do a Cantata sequence using "O"VpP and boys and young men singers.
              I wasn't talking about that in particular, but of the OVPP recordings I've heard (Rifkin, Kuijken, Montréal Baroque, Pierlot) I don't yet hear anything completely convincing using mixed voices, with regard for example to balance between voices and between voices and instruments - enough to convince me that this is the way to go (leaving aside all the evidence that this is the way it did go in the 1700s) but it's early days yet.

              Topicwise: as I mentioned before, JEG himself with uncharacteristic coyness decides in his book not to engage at all with this issue.

              Comment

              • MrGongGong
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 18357

                Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post

                Moving back towards the topic, though, I guess some people might think that the discipline and precision of JEG's performances is the result of the person in change being an authoritarian. One might think the same thing about the Arditti String Quartet, with which I have plenty of first-hand experience. But for everyone who achieves discipline and precision using those methods, there's someone who achieves it without them. It's just too facile to associate a particular style of performance with a particular kind of social behaviour.
                Very well put

                It does strike me as somewhat sad that some folks do seem to think that it is necessary to behave badly to create great art.
                I'd take the Arditti's over any self important and shouty conductor any day

                Comment

                • visualnickmos
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 3608

                  Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                  Very well put

                  It does strike me as somewhat sad that some folks do seem to think that it is necessary to behave badly to create great art. I'd take the Arditti's over any self important and shouty conductor any day
                  Quite.

                  Comment

                  • jayne lee wilson
                    Banned
                    • Jul 2011
                    • 10711

                    Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                    Very well put

                    It does strike me as somewhat sad that some folks do seem to think that it is necessary to behave badly to create great art.
                    I'd take the Arditti's over any self important and shouty conductor any day
                    Which folks? Which Art?
                    How do these folks arrive at the idea that bad behaviour is creatively necessary?
                    Do they employ it wilfully or cynically in the belief that it will achieve a specific result?
                    Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 12-03-17, 04:00.

                    Comment

                    • MrGongGong
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 18357

                      Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
                      Which folks? Which Art?
                      How do these folks arrive at the idea that bad behaviour is creatively necessary?
                      Do they employ it wilfully or cynically in the belief that it will achieve a specific result?
                      This says something maybe ?

                      Are Musical Geniuses Intrinsically Bullies? Russell Steinberg September 25, 2014 With terse painful poignancy, Glenn Berger details in  Esquire Magazine  his memory of musicians being brutally humiliated by Bob Dylan forty years ago at the New York recording sessions for Dyl

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30075

                        Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                        This says something maybe ?
                        But this is an article based on the experience of someone involved with music. Isn't bullying more to do with people being aware of the power they have over people, rather than just in music? Some people are bullies for various reasons, others aren't.

                        or "Perhaps for Dylan or Kirchner, asserting power and authority by humiliating people around them was a coping mechanism for these fears—not an intrinsic part of their genius."
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        • jayne lee wilson
                          Banned
                          • Jul 2011
                          • 10711

                          Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                          Interesting reading (and usefully wider references...!), thanks....
                          In a similar vein re. Toscanini -
                          As America's symbol of Great Music, Arturo Toscanini and the "masterpieces" he served were regarded with religious awe. As a celebrity personality, he was heralded for everything from his unwavering stance against Hitler and Mussolini and his cataclysmic tantrums, to his "democratic" penchants for television wrestling and soup for dinner. During his years with the Metropolitan Opera (1908-15) and the New York Philharmonic (1926-36) he was regularly proclaimed the "world's greatest conductor ." And with the NBC Symphony (1937-54), created for him by RCA's David Sarnoff, he became the beneficiary of a voracious multimedia promotional apparatus that spread Toscanini madness nationwide. According to Life, he was as well-known as Joe Dimaggio; Time twice put him on its cover; and the New York Herald Tribune attributed Toscanini's fame to simple recognition of his unique "greatness." In this boldly conceived and superbly realized study, Joseph Horowitz reveals how and why Toscanini became the object of unparalleled veneration in the United States. Combining biography, cultural history, and music criticism, Horowitz explores the cultural and commercial mechanisms that created America's Toscanini cult and fostered, in turn, a Eurocentric, anachronistic new audience for old music.

                          Comment

                          • Kingfisher
                            Full Member
                            • Aug 2023
                            • 38

                            Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post

                            I've heard musicians say similar things about what a horrible (but inspired) man he is, a bully, arrogant and liable to explode for no apparent reason.

                            There are plenty of wonderful conductors who aren't like this and it strikes me as sad that people allow him to get away with being such a tyrant.
                            Quite so - there are many much better conductors who inspire great performances by getting performers on their side, and would never physically assault them. JEG’s behaviour has been unacceptable for years - a despicable abuse of power.

                            Comment

                            • edashtav
                              Full Member
                              • Jul 2012
                              • 3667

                              Oh dear! It’s difficult when ones’s heroes are revealed to have feet of clay, or worse. I was delighted to attend the Q.E. Hall 100th Birthday Concert for Balfour Gardiner in December ,1977 when JEG introduced me to music about which I’d read much but heard little. I’ve followed JEG’s subsequent career with enthusiasm.
                              The story coming out of Berlioz’s birthplace is deeply disturbing, particularly as the apparent trigger for his unforgivable behaviour was trivial. If what we hear is true, I hope he gets effective medical help.

                              Comment

                              • Dave2002
                                Full Member
                                • Dec 2010
                                • 17998

                                Very unfortunate. I won't post the link, but if anyone wants to check this out a search will locate an article from the Mail. Indeed it does seem that the trigger was very minor, forgivable, and other conductors would have found other ways of dealing with the situation.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X