Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben
View Post
John Eliot Gardiner - the pros and cons...
Collapse
X
-
"I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance. Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit; touch it and the bloom is gone. The whole theory of modern education is radically unsound. Fortunately in England, at any rate, education produces no effect whatsoever. If it did, it would prove a serious danger to the upper classes, and probably lead to acts of violence in Grosvenor Square."
Lady Bracknell The importance of Being Earnest
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
Because he isn't just "someone else"? He is a high profile, very influential person and as such his behaviour makes bigger ripples in terms of the effect on others. It may only be subconscious but seeing someone in that position behaving like that risks making it seem normal and acceptable - even expected, perpetuating the perception of extreme behaviour being somehow a necessary part of high artistic endeavour and achievement.
Do you have any qualifiers in your support of artistic talent excusing bad conduct? Where does Robert King sit in that view? Please note, I am asking because I would be interested to know.
As I've tried to emphasise, I am not interested in "excusing" anyone's behaviour, or peddling my own opinion of them as human beings. I am more interested in analysing the effect these witch hunts have on the common weal. In King's case, I was disturbed by a salacious undercurrent to the moral condemnation. Here is somebody that most people want totally excluded from work and society, until his dying day. A wish which seems to have been granted, judging by the moribund nature of the King's Consort - despite the support of Dame Carolyn Sampson and other loyal colleagues. Then of course, the moral crusaders start going for them as well, so their defence of the anathemised one takes some courage and must be respected.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostAu contraire. The Guardian reported that witnesses described a 'quick' slap across the face, followed by a 'quick' punch on the mouth, after uttering the threat to throw a glass of beer over the culprit's head and being persuaded not to. And this after the show was over without any report of loud audience boos because someone exited left instead of right.
Shouldn't that have been the end of it?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostShouldn't that have been the end of it?
I agree the matter could now be laid to rest, as clearly nothing further will happen to him and his career, but not because of the 'triviality' of the offence.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LHC View Post
I'm not sure that's true anymore. The recent on-stage bust up between the lead singer and the guitarist of the band Jane's Addiction (which did include a punch being thrown), and the subsequent cancellation of the rest of their tour, was widely reported across several media. Something like this is always a good story for the press.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostCould drink and drugs be a factor ?
Happy to leave it at that: let's see how the Hamburg audience react - with their feet, going to the so-called "new" band and JEG? or by loyally standing by the rump of the old Monteverdi Orchestra and Choir?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostI see from french frank's Guardian link, that drugs were mentioned in mitigation by Sir John.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View Post
He is only a "very influential person" within our own, small sub-world. The majority of people would never have heard of him before social media and the popular press dredged this up, to show the masses how "the nobs" were still putting them down. It gives "ordinary folk" an opportunity to laugh at the pretensions of "high art", whose practitioners are proving themselves just as bad as the everyone else.
As I've tried to emphasise, I am not interested in "excusing" anyone's behaviour, or peddling my own opinion of them as human beings. I am more interested in analysing the effect these witch hunts have on the common weal. In King's case, I was disturbed by a salacious undercurrent to the moral condemnation. Here is somebody that most people want totally excluded from work and society, until his dying day. A wish which seems to have been granted, judging by the moribund nature of the King's Consort - despite the support of Dame Carolyn Sampson and other loyal colleagues. Then of course, the moral crusaders start going for them as well, so their defence of the anathemised one takes some courage and must be respected.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View Post
He is only a "very influential person" within our own, small sub-world. The majority of people would never have heard of him before social media and the popular press dredged this up, to show the masses how "the nobs" were still putting them down. It gives "ordinary folk" an opportunity to laugh at the pretensions of "high art", whose practitioners are proving themselves just as bad as the everyone else.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
I don’t blame them for laughing . So am I . JEG comes across in interview as insufferably pompous and self satisfied. He’s also quite incredibly rude . There was a telling piece of actuality in a SBS doc about him. He wasn’t happy with the singing by a group of French singers recording I think a Cherubini Revolutionary anthem. They weren’t putting enough oomph into it . He said to a woman in the front row “Peut-être vous etes monarchiste Madame ? “ He asked. “Pas-du-tout “ she replied very politely. What a twit he is - literally no idea how to handle people.
And at least JEG can speak French, and didn't speak to them SLOWLY AND LOUDLY in English!
Comment
-
-
Slightly changing tack and apologies if someone has said this in the last 22 screenloads, but I wonder whether the MCO et al's approach might be driven by future-proofing. While conductors may stay active till they are well over 80, sooner or later JEG would have had to lay down his baton, possibly preceded by a period of uncertainty and cancellations at short notice. If they sever ties with him now they can go looking for a successor immediately.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mopsus View PostSlightly changing tack and apologies if someone has said this in the last 22 screenloads, but I wonder whether the MCO et al's approach might be driven by future-proofing. While conductors may stay active till they are well over 80, sooner or later JEG would have had to lay down his baton, possibly preceded by a period of uncertainty and cancellations at short notice. If they sever ties with him now they can go looking for a successor immediately.Last edited by Retune; 18-10-24, 12:47.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Retune View Postsome cynic on Slipped Disc has made a rather apt comparison with the 'spite stores' on Curb Your Enthusiasm.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment