The Red Shoes less orchestra

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • verismissimo
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 2957

    The Red Shoes less orchestra

    Not the most committed of balletomanes, I often take greatest pleasure at performances, not from the goings-on on stage, but from the music itself, especially when played by a good live orchestra. Not that many ballets have first-rate music – it’s only Tchaikovsky, Prokofiev, Ravel and Stravinsky that for me can be relied upon in that department.

    However, I looked forward with great anticipation to the new ballet The Red Shoes, based on the classic Pressburger and Powell film of 1948, partly, perhaps principally, because it was to feature Bernard Herrmann’s outstanding music from a wide range of fine movies, many of them directed by Hitchcock.

    Imagine my disappointment, arriving at the Hippodrome in Birmingham, in discovering that the orchestra pit was empty. We were to be served up a pre-recorded soundtrack by the New Adventures Orchestra – pre-recorded, according to the programme, only in January. So the new ballet’s première and subsequent run in December at Sadler’s Wells had taken place with full orchestra and conductor in attendance, as had its early performances on tour.

    But by the time it reached the Second City, the pit was a dark hole, the loudspeakers blaring Herrmann’s music stridently.
    Did choreographer-impresario Sir Matthew Bourne assume that Brummies would not notice, or would not care, or would not know the difference? Did the members of the orchestra prefer to spend more time with their families? Was the Musicians Union asleep?

    Perhaps in future we might look forward to fully recorded opera at Covent Garden with the singers miming their roles, or indeed Sir Simon Rattle conducting one of his own recordings of Beethoven’s Choral Symphony at the Barbican, the singers and musicians kindly given the evening off?
  • Serial_Apologist
    Full Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 37691

    #2
    And what would have been wrong with Brian Easdale's original music for the film? It's quite well composed, albeit stylistically a bit Corny-goldish for the era. Everyone seems to have been short-changed by this project.

    Comment

    • verismissimo
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 2957

      #3
      Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
      And what would have been wrong with Brian Easdale's original music for the film? It's quite well composed, albeit stylistically a bit Corny-goldish for the era. Everyone seems to have been short-changed by this project.
      I thought that Herrmann's music was brilliantly apt and well organised for the work. It would have been nice if some musicians had been there to play it.

      I think this happens in ‘dance’ because choreographers think that the music is just a soundtrack.

      Comment

      • Once Was 4
        Full Member
        • Jul 2011
        • 312

        #4
        Originally posted by verismissimo View Post
        I thought that Herrmann's music was brilliantly apt and well organised for the work. It would have been nice if some musicians had been there to play it.

        I think this happens in ‘dance’ because choreographers think that the music is just a soundtrack.
        Sadly, this is a trend which has been creeping in for some time. About 15 years ago I was involved in a Musicians Union demonstration outside Halifax Civic Theatre against using recorded music for the pantomime there. Over in Manchester a similar demonstration took place outside one of its theatres. In both cases the police turned up to protect the musicians against drunken pre-Christmas revellers ("put your valuables in your instrument cases where you can see them sir and, any trouble, stick your hands up - we will be around and will come over!") Sadly, those musicians who depend on that kind of thing refused to take part just in case there was live music the next year and they got themselves 'rubbed out' of it. So it was left to classical musicians ('symph boys' as the Northern Radio players used to call us) to demonstrate for them on our days off. The most effective action though was from a principal player in the BBC Philharmonic who took his children to the Manchester pantomime and then took the production company to court under the Trades Description Act. The court found for the plaintiff against the production company. So ???
        Last edited by Once Was 4; 14-02-17, 20:51. Reason: Error of fact and bad English

        Comment

        • verismissimo
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 2957

          #5
          Originally posted by Once Was 4 View Post
          Sadly, this is a trend which has been creeping in for some time. About 15 years ago I was involved in a Musicians Union demonstration outside Halifax Civic Theatre against using recorded music for the pantomime there. Over in Manchester a similar demonstration took place outside one of its theatres. In both cases the police turned up to protect the musicians against drunken pre-Christmas revellers ("put your valuables in your instrument cases where you can see them sir and, any trouble, stick your hands up - we will be around and will come over!") Sadly, those musicians who depend on that kind of thing refused to take part just in case there was live music next year and they got themselves 'rubbed out' of it. So it was left to classical musicians ('symph boys' as the Northern Radio players used to call us) to demonstrate for them on our days off. The most effective action though was from a principal player in the BBC Philharmonic who took his children to the Manchester pantomime and then took the production company to court under the Trades Description Act. The court found for the plaintiff against the production company. So ???
          Well done, OW4! Is the MU totally toothless nowadays?

          Comment

          Working...
          X