If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I've always wondered what Fowles' motive was in writing that sentence. Of course, the context of that exclamation is that G.P. is very angry at Miranda's friends for being patronising towards him so, actually, Beecham gets off quite lightly.
I've always wondered what Fowles' motive was in writing that sentence. Of course, the context of that exclamation is that G.P. is very angry at Miranda's friends for being patronising towards him so, actually, Beecham gets off quite lightly.
I would say that JF is speaking directly through GP, not for the only time.
Offtopic, but JF's reputation seems to have taken quite a nosedive, as witness vinteuil's comment. It's many years since I read anything of his but I remember that at a certain age I found The Magus highly thought-provoking, obviously very much of its time in terms of things like sexual politics but it has certainly stuck firmly in my mind, as has The Collector.
"Those who can - Play. Those who can't - Teach (or talk about it)"
What a way to make a living!
HS
Well, that's certainly got me covered!!!
But what can have been Lebrecht's motive in writing in that way about Kleiber? I think he responded so defensively because of the inevitable back-lash he's had to endure!! And rightly so.
But what can have been Lebrecht's motive in writing in that way about Kleiber? I think he responded so defensively because of the inevitable back-lash he's had to endure!! And rightly so.
Well it depends whether he wrote the headline or as commonly happens a sub editor does and then the journalist gets it in the neck
Well it depends whether he wrote the headline or as commonly happens a sub editor does and then the journalist gets it in the neck
Except that the closing line was "He was the greatest non-conductor we have ever seen". Hardly a ringing endorsement, so the sub must have gleaned a certain idea from the piece to provide that headline.
Somebody has mentioned Thomas Beecham in this thread and it aroused my interest because, like Kleiber, Beecham never became a musician before going into conducting and was self-taught (except that Kleiber learned from watching his father during the formative years). Indeed, colleagues of Kleiber said he was never any good at playing the piano ('you always knew when he was playing because of all the wrong notes'!) and, according to Wiki, Beecham had 'hands which were too small' (the excuses some people make!). Both men studied 'counterpoint'.
Are there any other conductors who've never been proficient on a musical instrument? These are the only two I know about. And it seems odd.
Carlos Kleiber was one of the legendary conductors of his time, famous for his infrequent, but supreme interpretations. He had an unusual small repertoire fo...
Comment