Currently listening to Rautavaara’s string quintet, "Les Cieux Inconnues" (Unknown Heavens) and I really don’t know why, but the subtitle irritated me!
Is it gratuitous, cynical? Will it add undeserving interest? Ok, I’m obviously in miserablist mode!
Things were so much better in the old days. An 'Emperor here', a 'fantastique' there, a sole ' Inextinguishable' - all appropriate and sensible. I can even tolerate the three farts and a raspberry merchants with their, 'differences', ‘connotations', 'correspondences', 'face-flannel for large ensemble' and 'flatulations for orchestra and tape'.
But then came the 'symphonies of barrowful songs’, 'a schmuck descends into the hexagonal garden’ which then, it seems, gave licence to the marketing boys to take it to the nth degree.
Do we really need these names?
Does anyone have a favourite, real or made up?
Is it gratuitous, cynical? Will it add undeserving interest? Ok, I’m obviously in miserablist mode!
Things were so much better in the old days. An 'Emperor here', a 'fantastique' there, a sole ' Inextinguishable' - all appropriate and sensible. I can even tolerate the three farts and a raspberry merchants with their, 'differences', ‘connotations', 'correspondences', 'face-flannel for large ensemble' and 'flatulations for orchestra and tape'.
But then came the 'symphonies of barrowful songs’, 'a schmuck descends into the hexagonal garden’ which then, it seems, gave licence to the marketing boys to take it to the nth degree.
Do we really need these names?
Does anyone have a favourite, real or made up?
Comment