"Where have the great composers gone?"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • subcontrabass
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 2780

    "Where have the great composers gone?"

    The likes of Thomas Adès have many virtues, but British music shows no sign of producing successors to Britten, Tippett or Birtwistle
  • MrGongGong
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 18357

    #2
    I was waiting for this to be mentioned
    which has been well and truly trashed on social media

    Comment

    • Richard Barrett
      Guest
      • Jan 2016
      • 6259

      #3
      Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
      I was waiting for this to be mentioned
      which has been well and truly trashed on social media
      ... and deservedly so, and I'm not going to waste my time commenting further on it here.

      Comment

      • MrGongGong
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 18357

        #4
        Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Post
        ... and deservedly so, and I'm not going to waste my time commenting further on it here.
        Indeed

        Comment

        • Beef Oven!
          Ex-member
          • Sep 2013
          • 18147

          #5
          Have I missed something here, or is the author of this non-article saying that a composer needs to be great (whatever that means) and greatness is measured by how recognisable they are in restaurants and ATM queues? Are we then to turn to his/her music, to add another dimension to the discussion?

          Comment

          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
            Gone fishin'
            • Sep 2011
            • 30163

            #6
            The real question that the journalist is timidly avoiding is "Where have all the competent Music Journalists gone?" (I avoid adding "great", because that would be expecting far too much.)
            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

            Comment

            • ahinton
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 16122

              #7
              Originally posted by Beef Oven! View Post
              Have I missed something here, or is the author of this non-article saying that a composer needs to be great (whatever that means) and greatness is measured by how recognisable they are in restaurants and ATM queues? Are we then to turn to his/her music, to add another dimension to the discussion?
              Some composers wouldn't be recognised in ATM queues because they wouldn't be there as they have insufficient funds from their work to draw from the ATMs...

              Comment

              • cloughie
                Full Member
                • Dec 2011
                • 22116

                #8
                Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                The real question that the journalist is timidly avoiding is "Where have all the competent Music Journalists gone?" (I avoid adding "great", because that would be expecting far too much.)
                The quick answer is that a few have 'gone' in the last few years but history will probably show that there are a number busying themselves on Sibelius working on becoming great!

                Comment

                • Bryn
                  Banned
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 24688

                  #9
                  No names, no pack drill, but there is at least one I would place in the company of Britten, Tippett and Birtwistle who contributes to this very forum.

                  Comment

                  • Serial_Apologist
                    Full Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 37628

                    #10
                    Originally posted by ahinton View Post
                    Some composers wouldn't be recognised in ATM queues because they wouldn't be there as they have insufficient funds from their work to draw from the ATMs...
                    And royalty don't use cash, in any case.

                    Comment

                    • Serial_Apologist
                      Full Member
                      • Dec 2010
                      • 37628

                      #11
                      Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                      The quick answer is that a few have 'gone' in the last few years but history will probably show that there are a number busying themselves on Sibelius working on becoming great!
                      It's too late for Sibelius.

                      (I know, I know!)

                      Comment

                      • cloughie
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2011
                        • 22116

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                        It's too late for Sibelius.

                        (I know, I know!)
                        Certainly for l'eight

                        Comment

                        • Stanfordian
                          Full Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 9309

                          #13
                          My vote is for the Russian born, Munich based Rodion Shchedrin who is aged 84 now. I have a substantial collection of his output and I've been enjoying his comic opera 'The Left-Hander' on Blu-ray; one of his most recent works.

                          For those new to Shchedrin I recommend:
                          Concerto for orchestra No. 1 'Naughty Limericks'
                          Concerto for orchestra No. 3 'Old Russian Circus Music'
                          'The Sealed Angel' Russian liturgy for mixed chorus a cappella with shepherd's pipe
                          Carmen Suite, ballet in one act

                          Comment

                          • edashtav
                            Full Member
                            • Jul 2012
                            • 3670

                            #14
                            Is the arch-conservative Shchedrin the Stanford of our times, Stanfordian?

                            Comment

                            • ahinton
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 16122

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                              And royalty don't use cash, in any case.
                              Sure, but to composers, royalties are cash (or at least money in the bank) whereas, to others, "royalty" in UK signifies the monrach and her family - and none of them compose, do they? Elizabeth is no Maconchy, William's no Walton, Harry's no Birtwistle and Charles not even a Stanford, let alone a Gounod, a Widor or a KÅ“chlin...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X