Originally posted by MickyD
View Post
Basso Continuo
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by MickyD View PostIn the first recorded cycle of Mozart piano concertos with Malcolm Bilson and Gardiner, Bilson made a point of playing along with the orchestra - I remember attending various concerts in London in which he did so.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostThe "Cambridge Music Handbook" for Mozart's 20th and 21st Concertos contains a section summarising the evidence that Mozart "intended and expected the piano soloist to provide basso continuo accompaniment during the ritornellos and perhaps also during the shorter tutti passages within solo sections", which seems fairly convincing to me.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tetrachord View PostExcellent!! Though why this was so remains unclear.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostThe "Cambridge Music Handbook" for Mozart's 20th and 21st Concertos contains a section summarising the evidence that Mozart "intended and expected the piano soloist to provide basso continuo accompaniment during the ritornellos and perhaps also during the shorter tutti passages within solo sections", which seems fairly convincing to me.
In practice, Mozart composed these works with a view to being the soloist himself, so if he wanted to help to kepp the orchestra playing together, this would have been a way of doing so. Structurally, it's perhaps a different matter. In Mozart's concerto-sonata form, the orchestral exposition generally has both first and second subjects in the tonic key, unlike normal sonata form, which has the second subject in a different key. It's only when the soloist enters, in the "second exposition", that things change, with a new key introduced by the soloist. To have a audible piano jangling away in the background surely detracts from this.
If there's a conductor, the unwritten "continuo" is completely unnecessary anyway.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostStructurally, it's perhaps a different matter. In Mozart's concerto-sonata form, the orchestral exposition generally has both first and second subjects in the tonic key, unlike normal sonata form, which has the second subject in a different key. It's only when the soloist enters, in the "second exposition", that things change, with a new key introduced by the soloist. To have a audible piano jangling away in the background surely detracts from this.
If there's a conductor, the unwritten "continuo" is completely unnecessary anyway.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostIf so, did Mozart write a figured bass?
See also the chapter "Basso Continuo in Mozart's Piano Concertos" by Ellwood Derr, in Mozart's Piano Concertos: Text, Context, Interpretation edited by Neal Zaslaw, for more detailed information.
I think the evidence is fairly conclusive, having just looked through these two chapters again.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostI think the evidence is fairly conclusive, having just looked through these two chapters again.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThanks for that.
Most interesting, though I still think the only useful purpose was to keep the players together when there was no conductor.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
I don't think whether something is "harmonically complete" or not is a useful criterion. Plenty of Bach's ensemble music (concertos, suites etc. not to mention when vocal ensembles are added) is harmonically complete and yet a basso continuo was present. On the other hand much of Haydn's early music is far from harmonically complete (for example all the minuets written in two parts each doubled in octaves) and yet it's believed that Haydn didn't add a keyboard continuo. Derr's article shows in considerable detail that there's much more to the function of the keyboard continuo in Mozart's concertos than just keeping players together in the absence of a conductor. I suggest you take a look at it, but in the meantime I quote: "The issue as I understand it after more than twenty-five years of invesigation is not one of continuo realisation as a harmonic filler - by far too narrow an understanding of the technique and Mozart's application of it - but rather and much more importantly as a flexible shorthand for the pianist's accompanying parts during the times when principal focus is on the orchestra... to achieve compositional completeness."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostGood luck with your lecture, Tetrachord, not my subject, I'm afraid, but hope all will be good!
Comment
-
Comment