Originally posted by Roehre
View Post

Why pick a film score to play for the first part of the programme which has nothing directly to do with the concerto?

Why not illustrate those themes, from "Prince and the Pauper" etc, play them in their original context, then show how he reworked the material in the concerto...
I suspect expense is maybe the reason. It would presumably cost more to have full orchestral parts available for the scores of the various films from which the concerto was drawn. Maybe they had the 'Robin Hood' parts available, and so played that even though it's not directly relevant

Also, Stephen Johnson seemed keen to play down the fact that the concerto was derived from previous scores (he referred to them in the context of critical frowning at the piece early on). He was understandably concerned to show its internal organic structure, rather than highlighting any 'patchwork' aspect.
However, I also found there were too many generalised comments about 'chutzpah', 'kitsch', 'creamy melodies with plenty of sugar'...
But good to hear the piece anyway. I love it!
Comment