Yes, wasn't it Anthony Baines (writing at a time when it was virtually impossible to find any cornett players at all) who suggested that soprano sax was the best substitute?
BBC Young Musician 2016
Collapse
X
-
Yes, in Woodwind Instruments and their History, 1957 (p.263): 'the usual substitute for the cornett is the trumpet, though the oboe has also been tried, while a soprano saxophone is perhaps best of all'. Ah yes, Don Smithers: a formidable character! I remember getting outstandingly drunk with him in the Hague, some time in the late 70s (when he was flat-sharing with a good friend of mine). As you may recall, he had a glass eye, and when he needed to underline a point, he'd take it out and bang it on the table...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Caliban View Post
After the second concert, the members of the Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra invited us all to a grand dinner in the Opera House.
All the sections sat with their German counterparts so our six hornists sat with Peter Damm and his horn section. A great time was had by all, so naturally, when the Leipzig orchestra toured in England, we invited all of them to a dinner in the Highcliffe Hotel to repay the complement but, further still, I invited Peter Damm and his section to lunch at my house, where we gave them an English Luncheon of Roast Beef and Yorkshire pudding followed a selection of desserts.
Our guests tucked in enthusiastically (they'd been spending most of their subsistence allowances buying goodies to take home to their families and they must have been eating their first proper meals for days!)
Peter Damm spoke reasonably good English and I could get by in German (just about) so we exchanged a lot of views about playing (and teaching) methods and the subject of vibrato soon entered the discussion.
The thing was, that all the Eastern European Countries emulated that heavy Russian vibrato (try some of those early Czech Philharmonic recordings at that time) and, of course, so did the Paris Conservatoire Orchestra.
I don't know whether the fall of the Iron Curtain and the subsequent exchanges of visiting conductors and soloists had an effect but, magically that heavy vibrato of the Russian orchestras gradually faded away and, listening to Gergiev and his Majinsky orchestra these days, they sound much more like our own orchestras*, whose sound over the years has become heavier in comparison with, say, the nineteen fifties.
I like vibrato. I hate string players not using it at all (for historical accuracy - what about accurate intonation?) but I do accept that a lot of French music benefits from a suggestion of delicate use.
Anyway, to return to the subject, Peter Damm was trained to play the horn at a time when vibrato was considered mandatory for both instrumentalists and vocalists and his musicianship is unquestionable.
* for me, the only trace of Russian vibrato that is still apparent is Gergiev's waggling fingers and waving cocktail stick
HS
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ostuni View PostYes, in Woodwind Instruments and their History, 1957 (p.263): 'the usual substitute for the cornett is the trumpet, though the oboe has also been tried, while a soprano saxophone is perhaps best of all'. Ah yes, Don Smithers: a formidable character! I remember getting outstandingly drunk with him in the Hague, some time in the late 70s (when he was flat-sharing with a good friend of mine). As you may recall, he had a glass eye, and when he needed to underline a point, he'd take it out and bang it on the table...
* Yes I know it had been done by loads of people before...including Nadia Boulanger with the piano.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostI think people should listen to what brass bands are playing these days and how they are playing the music![FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Good riposte from the excellent Susan Tomes (she who memorably raged at the BBC's trivialising presentation of Young Musician a few years back):
Letters: Trumped-up issues of class and accessibility are distracting us from the real possibility that if classical music continues to be sidelined we may lose something very precious
'as music education focuses more and more on having a go rather than mastering a skill' … ???It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostGood riposte from the excellent Susan Tomes (she who memorably raged at the BBC's trivialising presentation of Young Musician a few years back):
Letters: Trumped-up issues of class and accessibility are distracting us from the real possibility that if classical music continues to be sidelined we may lose something very precious
'as music education focuses more and more on having a go rather than mastering a skill' … ???
BUT
I can't let this go unchallenged
All music-making is certainly beneficial, but western art music demonstrates a complexity and depth which few other musical genres have attained.
I could make a list but it would be a rather long one.
Western Art Music is one of the great inventions of human beings BUT it's NOT uniquely "complex" or "deep" by any stretch of the imagination no matter how much one might love it (and many of us DO love it dearly).
Music needs passionate advocates NOT these kind of sweeping statements which betray an ignorance and lack of understanding of music as a global phenomena.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostWestern Art Music is one of the great inventions of human beings BUT it's NOT uniquely "complex" or "deep" by any stretch of the imagination no matter how much one might love it (and many of us DO love it dearly).It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostShe doesn't say that, does she? Why have you paraphrased (inaccurately) what she said?
All music-making is certainly beneficial, but western art music demonstrates a complexity and depth which few other musical genres have attained.
and it's NOT true art all
She does use the words "complexity" and "depth" , so unless this is some kind of legal pedantic issue (and slipping into linguistic analysis again!) I thought what I said was fair.
There are many folks who DO think Western Art Music is some kind of Uniquely special thing in the universe and without comparison or parallels.
Comment
-
-
You introduced the word 'uniquely' which I set in bold to draw your attention to. She said, 'which few others have attained'.
There are many folks who DO think Western Art Music is some kind of Uniquely special thing in the universe and without comparison or parallels.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostThere's a difference between saying something has few parallels, and saying it is unique, which would mean that it has none.
Loose the word "unique" (can't edit it anyway)
It's still nonsense
THIS BIT
All music-making is certainly beneficial, but western art music demonstrates a complexity and depth which few other musical genres have attained.
IS that ok ?
Most of what she says is spot on BUT (again IMV) it's ruined by this.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostWhich (to my "didn't do literacy hour and i'm not a lawyer so use language in a less than precise way but seem to be mostly understood" brain) implies IMV (and i'm stressing that I'm ONLY SPEAKING FOR MYSELF) that other genres don't have "complexity" or "depth"....
IS that ok ?It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment