Tchaikowsky's last symphony
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hornspieler View PostCan we please stick to the subject of this post:
Tchaikowsky's 6th symphony and the legends which surround it
I received this email from a former member who finds that he is unable to post on these message boards:
CDs and how to remove sticky labels are totally off the point.
Symphony Nº 5 and its merits does not belong here.
Can we not stick to the point of this thread and take our matters both technical and irelevant elsewhere?
Thank you
HS
One seems to need to be both highly sensitive, and to have a hide like a buffalo in order to post on this forum.
It's no wonder so many people leave.
I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostWot about "7"?
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostAt the risk of going even further offtopic, I realise I've never heard Manfred. Recommended recordings would be welcome...
we really should have a separate thread for individual works though.....I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostReturning to the 6th, as I fear we must, I remember at a friend's house hearing the first movement of what sounded to me like a very exciting, expressive and precise recorded performance... I think it was Pletnev conducting, does that make any sense?
P.S. If you're not keen on #6, you might try the old ruse of reversing the order of the last two movements. All's well that ends well
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostAt the risk of going even further offtopic, I realise I've never heard Manfred. Recommended recordings would be welcome...
If you want idiosyncratic try Ahronovitch. If you want good but not new and cut try Kletzki. Otherwise Maazel, Svetlanov, Muti, Rostropovich, Jurowski or Petrenko. Enjoy
Comment
-
-
KOriginally posted by Beef Oven! View PostIt makes sense to me. I have been to some Pletnev Tchaikovsky concerts (I have no recordings) and he is very special with Chaik, IMV.
P.S. If you're not keen on #6, you might try the old ruse of reversing the order of the last two movements. All's well that ends well
I did that inadvertently when burning a download of Glazunov 5 to CD.
Interesting effect........I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostWhere've you been?
If you want idiosyncratic try Ahronovitch. If you want good but not new and cut try Kletzki. Otherwise Maazel, Svetlanov, Muti, Rostropovich, Jurowski or Petrenko. Enjoy"The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostReturning to the 6th, as I fear we must, I remember at a friend's house hearing the first movement of what sounded to me like a very exciting, expressive and precise recorded performance... I think it was Pletnev conducting, does that make any sense?
I have it, and it is very good. I've also had over the years, Haitink, Rostropovich, Muti and Chailly - all very good in very different ways. But I do like the Leonard recording teamsaint mentioned very much indeed. (Don't know the Petrenko - but I greatly admire his work.)
PS: forgot to mention; Pletnev's recording of the Pathetique was (one of) his first recordings as a conductor. Still available:
(second-hand looks more attractive!)[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
Comment