Originally posted by Richard Barrett
View Post
What's the point of music? Ask Peter Gabriel
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by jean View PostBut these sorts of discovery aren't facilitated by a single question What is the point?
(Especially as the point of anything has so many possible meanings.)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostIt's a good start.
I've asked first year undergraduate music students "what's music for?" many times.
Some things that are interesting in the responses are
1: that many of them have never thought about it before and struggle with the idea that it might be a question
and
2: Once they start to think about it they come up with lots of possible answers
There are many answers which doesn't mean it's not worth asking the question IMV
What's the best malt whisky?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostI've also come across this, or at least something broadly similar and, whilst all of these things, especially in combination one with another, could not be other than of help towards finding such an answer, there remains so much else that would seem to be essential if that anser is to be found.
I remember a piece Alpie posted some time ago - an analysis of a piece of music as found among some sorts of gospel congregations, entitled Charismatic manipulation. the implication was that whoever wrote the music has a cynical understanding of how music could affect the emotions, which they were able to employ to override any rational response on the part of the hearers.
But if you really could do this, you could accuse any musician of manipulation.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostWhilst I take your point here, what would you take to be the other questions that need to be asked alongside this one in order to work towards the attainment of all those discoveries?
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostI do think its a good question to ask, it is often assumed that musics functions and meanings are universal.
So long as one does move on to the larger questions, it doesn't matter too much where one starts, I suppose. To see where de Botton gets to, someone will have to attend the discussion.
Here's a quite sympathetic account of him doing the same sort of thing with visual art:
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostThat's what I thought.
I remember a piece Alpie posted some time ago - an analysis of a piece of music as found among some sorts of gospel congregations, entitled Charismatic manipulation. the implication was that whoever wrote the music has a cynical understanding of how music could affect the emotions, which they were able to employ to override any rational response on the part of the hearers.
But if you really could do this, you could accuse any musician of manipulation.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostThe "meaning" of music must surely change from age to age, and from social system to social system? What music meant to the peasantry in Mediaeval Germany would have been different to hunter-gatherers in the Iron Age, and from today's consumer.
I've never heard of hunter gatherer music......
I wonder if the early stuff is the best of it ?I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
Comment