Before the topic gets completely lost...
... there is this question of what role "classical" music ("North-West Asian Court Music" as the Australian composer Warren Burt calls it) can or should play in education, given its small and maybe diminishing role in culture at large. There seems to be agreement that any education worth the name ought to include a strong musical component, for reasons that have already been touched upon. But what music? and why? Do different musics differ in how they contribute to the beneficial effects of music in education? Is there a case for defending (or dismissing) "classical" music on this basis? And, turning back to the actual topic, could whether one calls it "classical" or something else be a factor here?
Personally I have very little experience in this area. I would venture to say, however, that defining "classical" music in an educational context as something elevated and implicitly superior in relation to more popular forms is not likely to be an attention-winner. Perhaps characterising different musics in terms of their (potential) social function is a more appropriate way to categorise them than how they're supposedly made ("composed") or even what they superficially sound like.
... there is this question of what role "classical" music ("North-West Asian Court Music" as the Australian composer Warren Burt calls it) can or should play in education, given its small and maybe diminishing role in culture at large. There seems to be agreement that any education worth the name ought to include a strong musical component, for reasons that have already been touched upon. But what music? and why? Do different musics differ in how they contribute to the beneficial effects of music in education? Is there a case for defending (or dismissing) "classical" music on this basis? And, turning back to the actual topic, could whether one calls it "classical" or something else be a factor here?
Personally I have very little experience in this area. I would venture to say, however, that defining "classical" music in an educational context as something elevated and implicitly superior in relation to more popular forms is not likely to be an attention-winner. Perhaps characterising different musics in terms of their (potential) social function is a more appropriate way to categorise them than how they're supposedly made ("composed") or even what they superficially sound like.
Comment