Originally posted by Petrushka
View Post
Pierre Boulez, RIP
Collapse
X
-
VodkaDilc
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostBINGO
Going back to the RAH Proms, wasn't it striking to compare the audience on the front couple of rows in the 1970s Proms and then the recent ones? In the 1970s they were predominatly young; now it's probably the same people, though some decades older. Has a sociological shift taken place in the make-up of the core Proms audience? And, if so, should the planners find the future a little worrying?
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostBINGO
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostHope so. I stupidly missed it.
I ended up getting home at 7.50 so I saw the whole thing (even foregoing the same-time live transmission of Manchester United smashing the mighty Derby County!).
Not to be missed Petrushka, get onto the iPlayer!!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven! View PostOh dear!
I ended up getting home at 7.50 so I saw the whole thing (even foregoing the same-time live transmission of Manchester United smashing the mighty Derby County!).
Not to be missed Petrushka, get onto the iPlayer!!I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by VodkaDilc View PostGoing back to the RAH Proms, wasn't it striking to compare the audience on the front couple of rows in the 1970s Proms and then the recent ones? In the 1970s they were predominatly young; now it's probably the same people, though some decades older. Has a sociological shift taken place in the make-up of the core Proms audience? And, if so, should the planners find the future a little worrying?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by VodkaDilc View PostGoing back to the RAH Proms, wasn't it striking to compare the audience on the front couple of rows in the 1970s Proms and then the recent ones? In the 1970s they were predominatly young; now it's probably the same people, though some decades older. Has a sociological shift taken place in the make-up of the core Proms audience? And, if so, should the planners find the future a little worrying?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mercia View Postyes very noticeable, and similar questions came to my mind
My guess would be that most of them are too busy working during the afternoons, (including the music students to help pay the loans), while those in the front couple of rows presumably have free time(taken holiday or retired) for the 2/3/4 hour queuing time.
How far the age mix has changed over time is another thing.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Correction/addition to previous posting.
Watching the NYO Proms extract stirred distant memories, confirmed by Dear Diary: I was there with my partner; it was his 32nd birthday (3 August 1987).
So I have seen Boulez conduct live more than I had originally remembered.
And indeed Jessye Norman sing (Mahler in Boston, Ariadne at Covent Garden, and this Prom).
The same thought about front row arena age struck us, too.
Comment
-
-
I wonder if this is the right place for a few thoughts about Boulez' conducting style...and results.
He had a fabulously clear beat...which is absolutely essential for his own very difficult scores (often with an element of 'conductor choice' anyway) and a beat which left no orchestral player in any doubt about his rhythmic and tempo intentions in more mainstream pieces. He got fantastic results from the NYO, and while they might not be considered 'amateurs' by many of us, it has always been my contention that a good amateur orchestra needs, above all, a very clear and unambiguous beat. NYO playing Gurre-Lieder? Unheard of when Ruth Railton first founded it!
PB's eagle eye (backed up by an eagle ear of course) always seems cold and unwavering...as if daring any individual player to deviate in any way from his intentions. So a clear beat...but body and facial language? I just wonder if, in the French/Russian repertoire (The Rite, La Mer, etc) his technique slightly inhibits orchestras from playing with every emotional fibre? It was always said, when he began conducting Debussy, that he brought a new clarity to it. Maybe too much? Monteux has always been my yardstick for this repertoire, and still is.
Seeing Michael Roll on the programme brought back memories. What became of him?
Comment
-
-
The claims that many listeners besides ardy have made about Boulez' conducting inhibiting players' emotional response to what they're playing (in Debussy in particular) has never been heard by my own response to his concerts and recordings. When I listen to them, they convince me that this is exactly how the Music should be performed and, that this work is the very finest piece of Music that has ever been written - just as it is with all great performances of all great Music, of course (including Monteux' - although I think he recorded Le Sacre a little too late into his career). Boulez ensures that it is the Music's emotional fibre that is communicated, rather than the performers' or his own - an approach I find utterly convincing and entirely honest.Last edited by ferneyhoughgeliebte; 31-01-16, 11:13.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
I think a whiff of fear (i.e. being terrified of doing something to offend the maestro) is probably in the mix of many orchestra/conductor relationships. The ideal balance probably lies somewhere between getting the lion to eat out of your hand and keeping it under control by waving a chair at it.
Comment
-
Comment