Can't find it - "Music" only includes Pop now! Or am i having a grey moment?
What's happened to "Classical" on revamped Independent website?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
Why?
Check out any good dictionary (e.g., Concise Oxford) and you will discover that the primary listing for such words is now under z, with s as the alternative. It is NOT creeping Americanization (sic), as many suspect!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostProblem with -iz spelling, Mr GG?
Why?
Check out any good dictionary (e.g., Concise Oxford) and you will discover that the primary listing for such words is now under z, with s as the alternative. It is NOT creeping Americanization (sic), as many suspect!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostProblem with -iz spelling, Mr GG?
Why?
Check out any good dictionary (e.g., Concise Oxford) and you will discover that the primary listing for such words is now under z, with s as the alternative. It is NOT creeping Americanization (sic), as many suspect!
Comment
-
-
I have a suspicion that these days, the Barbarians (tm) would be a franchised organisation, with their head office and other non core functions outsourced to the Far East, and with their registered offices in a Carribbean tax haven.
the gates would likely have been taken down and sold, to offset costs.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostNo change there then Oink Oink
Comment
-
-
Alpie has always had a thing about the -ize, I know not why.
We were here a couple of years ago -
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThe whole blog is riddled with those nausiating "...ize" endings.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View PostAlpie has always had a thing about the -ize, I know not why.
A fuller account of the reasons for preferring -ize (apart from the arguments from Hart and Fowler which we have had before):
http://www.metadyne.co.uk/ize.html
I must take issue with 'Phonetic considerations favour the z.' The letter "s" is pronounced with a buzzing sound (i.e. like a "z") monumentally more frequently than with a hissing sound, for which it's often doubled. Not only is this the case in its use in some of the most common words - is, his, hers, was, has, but also in most plurals.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostActually, I accept Mr GG's reproof. Hardly anyone in the UK uses the "z" spelling. The good people at Oxford are out of touch with reality, but are obsessed by Ancient Greek, quite forgetting that our language owes more to Latin than to Greek. How many Latin words contain the letter "z"?
I did my editorial training at The Institue of Physics; their journal style used the z, and I have never had a problem with it!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostApologies for continuing to be off main thread topic, but not just Oxford: my Chambers and Collins dictionaries also have the primary listing under the z option. Look up a word such as realize, for example.
I did my editorial training at The Institue of Physics; their journal style used the z, and I have never had a problem with it!
Comment
-
Comment