Originally posted by edashtav
View Post
Radio 3 - Neville Marriner day
Collapse
X
-
I think a little perspective is important here. I well remember the appearance of some of Marriner's recordings in the late '60s and early '70s, such as
Tippett Fantasia Concertante
Vivaldi op. 4 concerti 'La Stravaganza'.
Walton Sonata for Strings and Prokofiev Visions Fugitives.
In those days hardly anyone was recording that music, and these performances brought a new clarity . And let's not forget the splendid 'American' anthology with Ives' 3rd , Barber's Adagio and some rarities. The Academy's discs got uniformly good reviews.
By contrast I have to say many modern HIPP perfromances sound to me superficially exciting but lacking in depth. I've never been moved by them as I was with Marriner.
If you want 'bland' hear the London Mozart Players in the 1950s. They were successful, popular, sold out the RFH regularly, but the Record Guide wasn't impressed by the depth of interpretation.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by hmvman View Post
Again, these things are personal I guess, but the string sound of the ASMF has to me been one of the strongest features of their recordings. I've always thought they had a lush sound and sweet at the top without shrillness. One of the best examples I can think of is in 'The Birth of Venus' from Respighi's 'Trittico Botticelliano' (an EMI recording) where the trilling upper strings are wonderful IMHO, of course!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
I’m wondering whether the issue has more to do with the record company recording methods and, in particular, the transfer of old analogue recordings to CD. My judgement is clouded by the Philips CD’s I have of Neville and the band in the late Mozart symphonies . Again the sound feels over compressed and a bit thin.
Comment
-
-
Nev and the ASMF were a strong presence in my early collecting days and I don’t get the boring charge. To me they provided elegance and clarity with great sense of timing and flair. The Mozart recordings in particular were groundbreaking in that they showed all of these attributes were obtained with a smaller, nimble ensemble
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Rolmill View Post
My personal favourite Marriner recordings are the Rossini string sonatas and Bizet symphony in C (Argo), neither of which have been bettered (IMHO) and neither of which are remotely bland.Last edited by cloughie; 16-04-24, 17:20.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
Many thanks,pulcs, for making The Times so accessible.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View Post
Yes two more good ones there. As an afterthought to #3 I would say that Marriner’s Bach Orch Suites were a breath of fresh air cf Klemperer’s leaden gems but OK’s 1955 Eroica was not displaced by Nev’s 1982 recording - guess it is whose forte that wins!
Perhaps, to be set beside a book title from the British Library: Golden Dreams and Leaden Reality..
The first Pulcinella Suite that I bought on LP was conducted by OK. I've been searching for 50 years to sum it up. Got it: leaden gems. Thank you, cloughie!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostMy issue with Marriner and to be honest most modern instrument recordings in baroque repertoire is that the EC/Pinnock were the fresh air by the 1980s.
Ashamed to say that I don't have many Marriner CDs, but I did buy the Amadeus LP in my youth
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostHaitink is the man for Bizet’s Symphony in C .
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by edashtav View Post
'Klemperer's leaden gems': what an unusual epithet.
Perhaps, to be set beside a book title from the British Library: Golden Dreams and Leaden Reality..
The first Pulcinella Suite that I bought on LP was conducted by OK. I've been searching for 50 years to sum it up. Got it: leaden gems. Thank you, cloughie!
Comment
-
Comment