Originally posted by eighthobstruction
View Post
Listening as a Non-Musician
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Gargoyle View Post
I don't need to look on his wiki page - a privileged person for sure and what a name!? But he's very talentedbong ching
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by eighthobstruction View Post
....I think you do need to look at his wiki page....it will not take long........go on it's the weekend....he is only priviledged really because he came from gentle stock as might be called....dad a postman...mum an immigrant....grandfather some sort of musican and organ builder (not monied at all as far as I can see).... But he was White....Rural....lucky to go to really good school on the face of it because of where he lived....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Gargoyle View Post
'Brian' is a fancy construction?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by eighthobstruction View Post....is that you talking about yourself bryn???....how marvellous if so....Last edited by Bryn; 10-11-23, 23:13.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by RichardB View PostI agree. On a first listen anyway. But recordings, however high in quality, sometimes cause details to be obscured, which can then be resolved and indeed heard by reference to the score.
I had a second thought too, and haven’t found it previously addressed on this thread unless I’ve missed something. I’m not at all a musical theorist - I’m very bad at hearing chords and recognising them in any technical way, for example. I just appreciate what effect they, modulations, etc etc have on me. However I do in my bumbling amateur way participate in orchestral music, as a trombonist, and to that extent I am I guess ‘a musician’ - and I find that practising and playing a piece can definitely affect one’s appreciation… not necessarily for the better. It can take away the mystique, the spell of a piece.
A case in point is Brahms 1. In the last movement, the 1st trombone has an exposed quiet entry on a top A as part of the chorale which is a key moment in the piece. I absolutely loved this moment before I played the piece - stunningly beautiful playing by Berlin or Vienna trombonists etc etc. But it’s one of the most terrifying things I’ve ever had to play - a split or mis-pitched note and you’ve single-handedly trashed the movement. And top A is my least-favourite note on the instrument.
Since those rehearsals and that performance, I can’t now hear the piece in the same way - the palms go sweaty, the stomach tightens…
[Footnote: I actually did manage to nail The Note in the concert… so the mental scar is one of tension, not horror, fortunately]
.Last edited by Nick Armstrong; 11-11-23, 09:24."...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
I think Brahms may have been writing for the alto trombone. There are some pretty high notes in his second symphony too. I suspect he one day heard a very good trombonist in the 'Pastoral ' symphony, where the frst trombone part is an alto (I've seen it played on one) and it stayed in his subconscious. Similarly, Alban Berg may have heard that or the Brahms , and remembered it when he scored his Three Pieces, which has a cruelly high exposed solo.
I often hear passages in one composer which sound as if they had been listening to an earlier work by someone else and something stuck in the memory. There are many such moments in Benjamin Britten's music , curiously unacknowledged by his loyal fans.
Comment
-
Comment