New design of piano?
Collapse
X
-
... a 'radical' piano in that it goes back to the roots : straight (parallel) strung rather than over (crossed) strung.
But why not just replicate the earlier pianos - which Barenboim himself noted had qualities lacking in the modern version.
There are now many good makers producing replicas of all sorts of pianos ; there are not a few decent original instruments too...
Not quite sure what this 'new' piano will add - neither one thing nor the other?
-
-
Originally posted by subcontrabass View Post
Comment
-
-
Pianist Gwendolyn Mok, who plays an 1875 straight-strung Erard piano, has said that such instruments possess superior clarity.
"If you look inside your own piano, you will notice that the strings are all crossing each other," she told the San Francisco Examiner in 2013.
"With the straight strung piano you get distinct registral differences - almost like listening to a choir where you have the bass, tenor, alto, and soprano voices.
"It is very clear and there is no blending or homogenizing of the sound. It therefore gives you huge opportunities in experimenting with colour."
Said someone who hasn't looked inside a piano
"the strings are all crossing each other" really ??? why not have a look and see if they are ALL crossing each other?
Why are people who talk out of their arses allowed to have their pronouncements published?
and WTF does this mean?
"It is very clear and there is no blending or homogenizing of the sound"
No it isn't 'very clear' at all
(unlike the sky at the moment as I go over the Tay bridge)
I'm sure this is a wonderful instrument and will be wonderfully played BUT why the guff?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
Said someone who hasn't looked inside a piano
"the strings are all crossing each other" really ??? why not have a look and see if they are ALL crossing each other?
Why are people who talk out of their arses allowed to have their pronouncements published?
and WTF does this mean?
"It is very clear and there is no blending or homogenizing of the sound"
No it isn't 'very clear' at all
(unlike the sky at the moment as I go over the Tay bridge)
I'm sure this is a wonderful instrument and will be wonderfully played BUT why the guff?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostMrGG, you know exactly what the writer is trying to say. Don't be mean.
and, unlike some, can't afford an expensive piano
BUT this is GUFF (politely)
2:2 borderline fail IMV
She said that the strings all cross each other
they don't
SOME do
I wonder if she is a member of UKIP ?
(the North East of Scotland is rather beautiful don't you think dram)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tony View PostWhy go to all that trouble (and expense) when he could just play a Graf or a Nanette Streicher?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostBurn me at the stake, if you like, but I think listening to those early pianos is akin to being punished. This piano attempts to use some of the old methods with the huge benefit of modern developments.
(I bet YOU don't have ALPIE in gold letters on yours )Last edited by MrGongGong; 27-05-15, 09:00.
Comment
-
-
The web page of the designer Chris Maene on the new instrument: http://www.chrismaene.be/en/news/chr...ert_grand.aspx
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
Said someone who hasn't looked inside a piano
"the strings are all crossing each other" really ??? why not have a look and see if they are ALL crossing each other?
Why are people who talk out of their arses allowed to have their pronouncements published?
and WTF does this mean?
"It is very clear and there is no blending or homogenizing of the sound"
No it isn't 'very clear' at all
(unlike the sky at the moment as I go over the Tay bridge)
I'm sure this is a wonderful instrument and will be wonderfully played BUT why the guff?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post"Pianist and conductor Daniel Barenboim has unveiled a new type of piano, which he says is "radically different" to the standard concert grand."
DIFFERENT FROM...
Modern English Usage [1926]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by David-G View PostApart from her unfortunate choice of wording regarding the strings, Gwendolyn Mok is perfectly correct. I have a Broadwood square of 1804 and a Bluthner grand of 1881 (in which the bass is almost straight-strung), and so I know this from personal experience. The instruments are very clear, and Ms Mok's summary seems pretty clear too.
I know what she means but "very clear" is not a good description of acoustical phenomena.
Comment
-
Comment