Originally posted by Richard Barrett
View Post
Late works
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View PostVerdi began Otello at 71, Falstaff at 76.
Sondheim's claim puts him in poor Company and is one of his Follies; it may not be the case that Anyone Can Whistle at his/her best even unto his/her dying day, but it's hard to imagine that more than a tiny minority would believe him...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostWould I not be correct in suggesting that certain of your own works were "late", as in being delivered after the deadline?
Comment
-
-
Roehre
Let's start by defining what's a "late work".
Is it work composed at a certain age, or a couple of years before the composer's death?
I don't think of Mahler or Berg dying at 50 makes their works "late works", just not to mention Mozart of Schubert.
Beethoven ied at 56. His last sonatas and quartets "late works"?
What are Haydn's works composed being that age then , like the London symphonies. Or is the Seasons hence a "very late work"?
The concept of a "late work" as a universally valid criterium is nonsense.
"Earlier of later styles" is not without difficulty either, but makes at least a connection with the composer's development and hence age.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Black Swan View PostI think the idea of late works being less than earlier works is as said subjective. I am listening now to a very fine recording of Sibelius 7. Maybe this would not be considered late
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by."
[Douglas Adams]Last edited by ahinton; 14-03-15, 05:49.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Roehre View PostLet's start by defining what's a "late work".
Your comments suggest that you don't regard late Mahler or Berg as "late works" - and even "late" Beethoven was, as you say, written when he was in his mid-50s. So can the concept can only be applied to composers like Rameau, Schütz and Verdi who lived into old age?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lento View PostThe late work of most first-rate artists is second-rate, according to Stephen Sondheim, citing Stravinsky and Picasso as exceptions. That's quite a claim, but one (being a person who in truth would often rather listen to early Beethoven, say, than late) I have some degree of sympathy with, possibly. (Times paywall, I'm afraid).
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/arts/s...cle4380358.ece
Comment
-
-
Roehre
Originally posted by makropulos View PostSo: How would you define them, if the definitions of others are such "nonsense"?
Your comments suggest that you don't regard late Mahler or Berg as "late works" - and even "late" Beethoven was, as you say, written when he was in his mid-50s. So can the concept can only be applied to composers like Rameau, Schütz and Verdi who lived into old age?
Indeed I don't regard Berg's as "late" works, Beethoven was developing a "new" style (hence op.135 is much more classical than 130-133), Mahler 9/10/LvdE might be called a late style, as it's a result of realisation of his own mortality, but is Strauss' contemporary Rosenkavalier then a "late work"?
Comment
Comment