Music has nothing to do with politics (again) ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MrGongGong
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 18357

    Music has nothing to do with politics (again) ?

    UPDATE: On March 5, NCAC and several prominent artistic freedom and free speech groups sent this letter to the NY Youth Symphony in protest of their decision to cancel Tarm's performance.     (NEW YORK, NY)-- On the eve of Music Freedom Day, the New York Youth Symphony (NYYS) struck a blow against artistic expression by abruptly canceling a
  • Beef Oven!
    Ex-member
    • Sep 2013
    • 18147

    #2
    This type of censorship is scary. And counter-productive.

    Comment

    • Serial_Apologist
      Full Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 37814

      #3
      All future performances of Debussy's "En blanc et noir" had better be banned then. Oh, and Region 2 of Stockhausen's "Hymnen" as well, containing as it does that quote from the Horst Wessel Lied.

      Civilisation seems to be becoming more and more thin-skinned. Would they perform the WW2-satirising sketch from "Beyond the Fringe" today? Audiences comprising those who lived through it as well as mine born just after laughed without being in any way offended.

      Comment

      • french frank
        Administrator/Moderator
        • Feb 2007
        • 30455

        #4
        "Some audience members may have painful memories associated with the official music of oppressive regimes but that should not mean that any work that references this music must be silenced." No, of course not - because, in a sense, that is why it was included, for its emotional impact - which is not something to be avoided. If it were glorifying the events it would be different, but I doubt it was. As Owen wrote of War, and the pity of War.
        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

        Comment

        • MrGongGong
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 18357

          #5
          A venue that cancelled a gig by controversial jazz saxophonist Gilad Atzmon is criticised for giving in to bullying.



          And it’s worth noting that the Zionist pressure group substantiated their ‘arguments’ by referring to the writing of none other than Alan Dershowitz, currently implicated in a huge sex scandal . This puzzles me. Would the RNCM cancel my concert based on criticism of my work voiced by the likes of s

          Comment

          • Oliver

            #6
            I'm not surprised; the Zionist lobby in the US is running amok at the moment, thanks (in part) to the Evangelical Christian (sic) buffoons in Congress.
            Here in the UK, it is less powerful but once it gets its claws, both legal and financial, into a dissident like Gilead, it invariably draws blood.....particularly if he/she is regarded as a "renegade" Jew or Israeli.

            Comment

            • Old Grumpy
              Full Member
              • Jan 2011
              • 3643

              #7
              Sad state of affairs - Gilad is a fine musician, if he does go on a bit...

              Comment

              • french frank
                Administrator/Moderator
                • Feb 2007
                • 30455

                #8
                I think we can agree that 'music' can sometimes be political, and sometimes politicised. Here it would appear to be both, but to stick to the spirit of the thread title, however, I hope we shall focus on the former ...

                I would like to hear of examples where the music itelf is inherently 'political' rather than being used/exploited/manipulated for political purposes - which is what I suspect people mean in saying 'music is political' or can't exclude/be divorced from politics.
                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                Comment

                • Serial_Apologist
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 37814

                  #9
                  Originally posted by french frank View Post
                  I think we can agree that 'music' can sometimes be political, and sometimes politicised. Here it would appear to be both, but to stick to the spirit of the thread title, however, I hope we shall focus on the former ...

                  I would like to hear of examples where the music itelf is inherently 'political' rather than being used/exploited/manipulated for political purposes - which is what I suspect people mean in saying 'music is political' or can't exclude/be divorced from politics.
                  But, how can music not be inherently political, given that its expression is social and therefore inescapably political?

                  How it is political, i.e. how the political is expressed in musical terms, differs from era to era - this being an important aspect of music's evolution, I would have thought.

                  Comment

                  • french frank
                    Administrator/Moderator
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 30455

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                    But, how can music not be inherently political, given that its expression is social and therefore inescapably political?
                    Perhaps our understanding of what the word 'inherent' means differs when applied to music.

                    People will say that music can't be 'inherently' tragic, 'inherently' beautiful, for example: the way people experience it is personal to them; and what one person finds melancholy another finds peaceful, what one finds tuneless another finds melodic.

                    What do you mean when you say of music that 'its expression is social'? Maybe you take 'political' in a different sense? Everything is connected to everything? I don't find your use of these words have any meaning for me.
                    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                    Comment

                    • Old Grumpy
                      Full Member
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 3643

                      #11
                      Originally posted by french frank View Post
                      Perhaps our understanding of what the word 'inherent' means differs when applied to music.

                      People will say that music can't be 'inherently' tragic, 'inherently' beautiful, for example: the way people experience it is personal to them; and what one person finds melancholy another finds peaceful, what one finds tuneless another finds melodic.

                      What do you mean when you say of music that 'its expression is social'? Maybe you take 'political' in a different sense? Everything is connected to everything? I don't find your use of these words have any meaning for me.
                      Some might say that Jazz is inherently political.

                      OG

                      Comment

                      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                        Gone fishin'
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 30163

                        #12
                        Originally posted by french frank View Post
                        Perhaps our understanding of what the word 'inherent' means differs when applied to music.

                        People will say that music can't be 'inherently' tragic, 'inherently' beautiful, for example: the way people experience it is personal to them; and what one person finds melancholy another finds peaceful, what one finds tuneless another finds melodic.
                        The sounds in a piece of Music aren't "inherently" meaning-specific, but the choice(s) that Musicians make of which Musical sounds they are going to make is a matter of cultural preference - and as such, inherently "political"; not in the sense of supporting any particular political party line, but in the sense of expressing to others what values and conventions are important to the Musicians making those choices.

                        All cultural choices are political in this wider sense - wearing a wedding ring is a choice to let others see that the ring-wearer has accepted, approves of, and values the social conditions that "Marriage" entails.
                        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                        Comment

                        • french frank
                          Administrator/Moderator
                          • Feb 2007
                          • 30455

                          #13
                          Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                          The sounds in a piece of Music aren't "inherently" meaning-specific, but the choice(s) that Musicians make of which Musical sounds they are going to make is a matter of cultural preference - and as such, inherently "political"; not in the sense of supporting any particular political party line, but in the sense of expressing to others what values and conventions are important to the Musicians making those choices.

                          All cultural choices are political in this wider sense - wearing a wedding ring is a choice to let others see that the ring-wearer has accepted, approves of, and values the social conditions that "Marriage" entails.
                          I suspected the answer would be something like that - S_A may have additional thoughts, but this is a very attenuated interpretation of 'political'. The political aspect becomes insignificant once everything can be included in the definition. I don't really feel there is a necessary connection between the social, cultural and the political.

                          Political implies some sort of engagement with social organisation/government/authority, and the extent of the political depends on the nature and extent of the engagement. Surely?
                          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                          Comment

                          • teamsaint
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 25225

                            #14
                            Would " political" not imply a relationship with, rather than engagement with?

                            Most people would describe Crass as " political", but I would imagine their relationship would be one of complete disengagement from the mainstream political?
                            I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                            I am not a number, I am a free man.

                            Comment

                            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                              Gone fishin'
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 30163

                              #15
                              Originally posted by french frank View Post
                              The political aspect becomes insignificant once everything can be included in the definition.
                              I don't think so - the significance of the political aspect becomes clearer once the definition is extended.

                              Political implies some sort of engagement with social organisation/government/authority
                              Yes - it's the nature of the "sort" that creates the differences between our understanding, I think.

                              and the extent of the political depends on the nature and extent of the engagement. Surely?
                              Not necessarily - people can (and do) partake in political activities ("some sort of engagement with social organization etc") often without being aware of the extent to which they are participating.
                              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X