If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Women Composers' Thread/International Women's Day 2015 on R3
I'm not obsessed by gender - but I think you might be, Scotty.
Okay, okay, I admit it, Flossie ... if I had to take either Simone Young or Leif Segerstam to my desert island and be condemned to discuss Bruckner interpretation for the rest of my life, I could easily be found guilty of the most appalling genderism.
Okay, okay, I admit it, Flossie ... if I had to take either Simone Young or Leif Segerstam to my desert island and be condemned to discuss Bruckner interpretation for the rest of my life, I could easily be found guilty of the most appalling genderism.
That's just the point. The sex of the composer isn't important. The music is.
That's just the point. The sex of the composer isn't important. The music is.
I think you might be missing the point. Lutyens, Williams, Musgrave, Tower, Beach and other's music is 'important' but does not get considered as such. Much less 'important' music is considered ahead of these composers. Let's say that in the absence of any other explanation, we can conclude that it is endemic sexism that causes this 'anomaly'.
Only if it affects the sound, which is many cases, it does.
Is it significant that Max lives in the Orkneys ?
Yes, because it some of his compositions have been prompted/inspired by his residency there.
[/QUOTE]
Is it significant that Messiaen wrote a quartet in a prisoner of war camp?
OR is it just sounds?
More likely both, just as Shostakovich's Leningrad Symphony is clearly affected by the composer's location at the time. But their sex is irrelevant.
Originally posted by Beef Oven
I think you might be missing the point. Lutyens, Williams, Musgrave, Tower, Beach and other's music is 'important' but does not get considered as such. Much less 'important' music is considered ahead of these composers.
That's a valued judgement in itself. However, putting on a Radio 3 saturation "show" JUST BECAUSE OF THEIR SEX, and then ignoring them once again, is not the answer.
Is that like the advanced booking we're sometimnes offered?
But seriously: could people who only want to discuss whether women composers should have a thread to themselves please go away and start a thread about it, and leave this one to serve the purpose it was intended for.
But seriously: could people who only want to discuss whether women composers should have a thread to themselves please go away and start a thread about it, and leave this one to serve the purpose it was intended for.
That's a valued judgement in itself. However, putting on a Radio 3 saturation "show" JUST BECAUSE OF THEIR SEX, and then ignoring them once again, is not the answer.
Spot on!
Women, like men, should be judged entirely on ability.
Everything else, like gender, big noses, stick-out ears, or whatever, is completely irrelevant!
Comment