Originally posted by Pabmusic
View Post
Shostakovich - Copyright
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by CallMePaul View PostI believe this, rather than any musical reasons, is why Stravinsky produced (and copyrighted worldwide) the 1947 editions of his major Russian period works. Although opinion is divided on the merits of the 1947 Petrushka where the changes are major[I]vis-a-visI] the 1911 version, most critics greatly prefer Stravinsky's originals.
Devilment aside, the Petrushka revision is in a different class from those of Firebird or Le Sacre - valid in its own right, and certainly giving insights about the composer's development in the thirty-six years since he'd originally conceived the work.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
But Happy Birthday To You is still in copyright, both in the USA and Europe. The owner renewed the copyright, so it didn't lapse in 1923. Patty Hill (who wrote it) died in 1946. So it will be out of copyright in Europe from New Year's Day, 1917. No doubt the Americans will manage to keep it for much longer.[/
Comment
-
-
Let us not forget Stravinsky's own copyright infringement re. Émile Spencer's La Jambe en bois. which he quotes in all versions of Petrushka, and eventually had to pay royalties for. Frank Zappa got a double whammy for that when he made is own arrangement of the relevant section of Petrushka for his band.
Comment
-
Comment