Coming back to the first question, Celibidache avoided conducting any Mahler symphony his whole career, but championed Bruckner all his life.
Conductors who avoid certain composers....
Collapse
X
-
slarty
-
Originally posted by slarty View PostWhich Petrenko do you mean? Kirill, who is GMD at the Bavarian State Opera or Vasily, the Liverpool fan?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pabmusic View PostKarajan is said to have called Elgar's Enigma "second-rate Brahms". Which goes to show...
Avctually, if he did believe this, it's peculiar that he should conduct and record Music by composers who would have given various limbs to produce a work that could be described as "second-rate Brahms": there are very, very few for whom the expression would be an insult![FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post... that one shouldn't pay any attention to what people are "said to have" said? I've heard this Karajan attributation before, but I've never encountered it in any of the writings on/about/by the conductor. Rattle is reported to have told someone that he doesn't conduct Elgar in Berlin because the "general perception" there is that it's just "second-rate Brahms", so maybe it was an opinion held by Karajan.
Avctually, if he did believe this, it's peculiar that he should conduct and record Music by composers who would have given various limbs to produce a work that could be described as "second-rate Brahms": there are very, very few for whom the expression would be an insult!
Comment
-
-
I meant Petrenko the Liverpool fan of course.
The 'second-rate Brahms' comment I've never really understood, other than the Berliners must hear Elgar completely differently than what we do. Schumann and Dvorak one can hear, and Brahms provides the link, so perhaps that is what they hear. Elgar's stylistic origins though are through composers such as S S Wesley and John Goss. Anyway that could be the subject of another thread.
Another possibly interesting area is which of the well known conductors have dabbled in conducting opera and which largely avoid it. I may be wrong but those who do dabble opera only seem to do so with a very small number of works.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post... that one shouldn't pay any attention to what people are "said to have" said? I've heard this Karajan attributation before, but I've never encountered it in any of the writings on/about/by the conductor. Rattle is reported to have told someone that he doesn't conduct Elgar in Berlin because the "general perception" there is that it's just "second-rate Brahms", so maybe it was an opinion held by Karajan.
:
And I don't like the implication that I've somehow made this story up.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostRattle is reported to have told someone that he doesn't conduct Elgar in Berlin because the "general perception" there is that it's just "second-rate Brahms", so maybe it was an opinion held by Karajan.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by pastoralguy View PostAnd I don't like the implication that I've somehow made this story up.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
I think there is an interesting point in the above discussions, is it always the conductor's fault that they don't record or conduct certain repertoire and is it sometimes that some orchestras and managers actively resist playing anything outside their core repertoire? To be honest I would have hated to be a player in something like the Vienna Philharmonic, with its very narrow repertoire and the Berliner's, though it has widened somewhat is still not that extensive.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Suffolkcoastal View PostThe 'second-rate Brahms' comment I've never really understood, other than the Berliners must hear Elgar completely differently than what we do. Schumann and Dvorak one can hear, and Brahms provides the link, so perhaps that is what they hear. Elgar's stylistic origins though are through composers such as S S Wesley and John Goss.
Comment
-
-
slarty
As for English composers performed by the BPO -
Karajan exercised total control over the BPO during his tenure, but he never interfered with the concert programming of Barbirolli when he made his annual visits from 1961 to 1970.
He performed Vaughan-Williams Symphonies 5 & 8 and the Tallis, Walton's Viola Concerto with Cappone (orchestra principal) as soloist and Elgar's Enigma, Intro & Allegro and the Cello Concerto during his time there. Had he lived longer he may well have ultimately performed one of the Elgar Symphonies there, as he did almost everywhere else he guest conducted during those years.
Maybe Karajan felt that that was enough.
Comment
-
Yes - and again, it's difficult to separate the concert repertoire of a conductor with their discographies because that's all they "do" posthumously, so to speak. The BPO, even with Karajan (who programmed Henze and Penderecki in concerts), had a wider repertoire than their recorded catalogue from the 60s - 80s.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostBoulez regards his refusal to have anything to do with Tchaikovsky as a badge of honour. It isn't.
I don't follow conductors enough to know which of the others listed here are also specialists in certain areas. For many conductors, for instance, a failure to conduct the Vaughan Williams symphonies is not a particularly shocking omission—they're little played outside the UK—but for a conductor who specialises in British music it would indeed be a surprise.
Comment
-
Comment