Originally posted by ardcarp
View Post
John Ogdon - Living with Genius
Collapse
X
-
Richard Tarleton
Originally posted by johnb View PostI've just come across this very thoughtful and sympathetic article by Andrew Clark in the FT. Worth reading IMO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View PostIndeed. A desperately sad programme just now. I haven't read the recent biog - but don't think I could. A chance to observe Brenda's body language - watch the narrowing of the eyes, the pursing of the mouth - as she blames everybody else.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View PostIndeed. A desperately sad programme just now. I haven't read the recent biog - but don't think I could. A chance to observe Brenda's body language - watch the narrowing of the eyes, the pursing of the mouth - as she blames everybody else.
But about 30 minutes in, what on earth is that circus of a performance of those wretched Franck Symphonic Variations?!? With Ogdon, solo, on an empty opera stage, and the orchestra down in the pit! And was that Karajan conducting?! What the hell was going on?!
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Very interesting, very frightening. I never heard him play, but I remember hearing a lot about him and his terrible problems.
I do, wonder, though - I've often wondered this - if a performer can ever be called a genius. Doesn't a genius have to create things rather than perform them? The composer, not the performer of them, is the genius. The term seems to be applied when a performer appears superhuman, and perhaps that's right. I remember thinking Nureyev was a genius when I first saw him. Jacqueline Du Pre had an element of it, too. They seem possessed. Is there anyone like that now?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mary Chambers View PostVery interesting, very frightening. I never heard him play, but I remember hearing a lot about him and his terrible problems.
I do, wonder, though - I've often wondered this - if a performer can ever be called a genius. Doesn't a genius have to create things rather than perform them? The composer, not the performer of them, is the genius. The term seems to be applied when a performer appears superhuman, and perhaps that's right. I remember thinking Nureyev was a genius when I first saw him. Jacqueline Du Pre had an element of it, too. They seem possessed. Is there anyone like that now?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mary Chambers View PostVery interesting, very frightening. I never heard him play, but I remember hearing a lot about him and his terrible problems.
I do, wonder, though - I've often wondered this - if a performer can ever be called a genius. Doesn't a genius have to create things rather than perform them? The composer, not the performer of them, is the genius. The term seems to be applied when a performer appears superhuman, and perhaps that's right. I remember thinking Nureyev was a genius when I first saw him. Jacqueline Du Pre had an element of it, too. They seem possessed. Is there anyone like that now?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mary Chambers View PostVery interesting, very frightening. I never heard him play, but I remember hearing a lot about him and his terrible problems.
I do, wonder, though - I've often wondered this - if a performer can ever be called a genius. Doesn't a genius have to create things rather than perform them? The composer, not the performer of them, is the genius. The term seems to be applied when a performer appears superhuman, and perhaps that's right. I remember thinking Nureyev was a genius when I first saw him. Jacqueline Du Pre had an element of it, too. They seem possessed. Is there anyone like that now?
Comment
-
-
Thank you, John. I wonder if it's true he'd have 'gone nowhere' today? It's true he'd have been a marketing nightmare, but I think he might still have won competitions. Being 'physically in attractive' is less important, sadly, for a man than it is for a woman. There are quite a few physically unattractive performers around.
I know he did compose, but the bits I've heard of his work don't sound anything special to me. I doubt if his composing shows the 'genius' his playing does.
Comment
-
-
Bloody odd presentation of the concert after on BBC 4 wasn't it? Odd soft focus on La Derham's particularly bouffante hair-do - it practically only needed a wind machine to complete the strange filmic effect - and an odd audience... and 4 DSCH Preludes and Fugues captioned of which we only got 2 (unless in the producer's mind 2 x Preludes and 2 x Fugues = 4 Preludes and Fugues )
Bit of a lash-up I thought."...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Agree about the presentation of the Donohoe recital. The piano sound was a bit too direct, maybe, but I enjoyed his playing very much. I love those Shostakovitch P&Fs, even if we only got two.
Going back to the JO programme, indeed Brenda came over as rather scary. That sudden wide-mouthed smile was unsettling. OTOH, it is a demanding and sometimes frightening thing to care for someone with mental health problems. It takes its toll. We shall never know whether pressure from Brenda, JO's agent, or both, triggered the psychosis and depression which was probably latent in JO's personality.
BTW, that clip with Ogden on the stage and the orchestra in a pit was indeed extremely odd! Sometimes the material the producers had at their disposal was not joined up coherently...and there was a bit of 'cheating' with freshly made clips. But than goodness there was no idiotic presenter cavorting on camera.
Comment
-
Comment