Roger Wright moves to Aldeburgh Music

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DracoM
    Host
    • Mar 2007
    • 12956

    A 'Controller' of Radio 3? Judging by the somewhat pessimistic details etc above, it would seem that any 'Controller' of Radio 3 is....not really in much of a position to be a 'Controller', since the resources available to him / her are increasingly mortgaged to other areas, or 'controlled' by the 'Controller of Music', or the 'Controller of Arts'. That the two gentlemen named in those posts seem not to have much background in nor apparntly commitment to the very particular remit of R3, even a pessimist must be downhearted.

    Increasingly, the 'Controller' of R3 is merely admin, he/ she need have no intimate background in any of the core areas of R3, but merely a track record as a Beeb insider administrator. R3 simply becomes a commodity. Given that the massive pressure on public media to scramble after the crudely termed 'yoof' market [elusive, and many would argue now actually unreachable by such platforms as the BBC given the changes in how such music etc for the age group is delivered and accessed ], the easy listening market, the comedy market, the sport market, the R3 core remit of classical music is very seriously threatened.

    Most of the BBC's major talk / critical / analytic / debate radio programmes have been incrementally re-assigned / re-designed to R4 specs eg in a sense 'In our time' is by its nature a R3 type programme, and then there are Front Row and Saturday Review which would seem to sit more naturally and more comfortably on R3, the Reith Lectures are now on R4 [how ironic is that!], most of the truly challenging music is being scheduled later and later in the day/night, and drama shunted likewise later and later, with the view of eventually shunting it out of R3 altogether one suspects, so that all in all, R3 is being prepared as the BBC's challenger to CFM by stealth, or maybe no longer by stealth, but in a bit of a hurry. As indeed, CFM quite rightly drew the CMS Cttee's attention to recently.

    All the talk is of Tony Hall being so wedded to Music and the Arts, but the appointments he has made would seem to indicate something else. Thanks to the BBC Trust's invertebrate indifference to representations either from listener groups, or apparently the Parliamentary CMS Cttee's analyses and investigations, the BBC is able unmolested to be impervious to the increasing despair of many at its slow but steady abdication of the pursuit of excellence in any field. R3 is no longer seen, apparently, as a jewel in the crown, but a millstone round its neck as it jostles into the popular entertainment market on all its platforms.

    So by his appointments shall ye know the DG. I do not lament RW's departure, but I certainly do fear the prepared weapons of emasculation that await his successor.

    Comment

    • Pulcinella
      Host
      • Feb 2014
      • 10872

      HG:

      Why should acquired programming be random?
      It's actually the random nature of current programming that drives me (and others) to distraction!

      I happen to think that the BBC has a duty to transmit ALL concerts put on by their orchestras and performing groups, for example, to let those that don't live within travelling distance of the concert hear what's played. Preferably as whole concerts, not snippets over several programmes, however beautifully presented by the `broadcasters' (by the way, isn't the BBC the broadcaster, not the announcer/presenter?).

      Comment

      • french frank
        Administrator/Moderator
        • Feb 2007
        • 30213

        Originally posted by Honoured Guest View Post
        OTOH, Radio 3 is the principal beneficiary of the broadcast output of the Proms and Performing Groups, and it is prudent that Radio 3 bears a significant proportion of their costs, as the major stakeholder, most suited to influence their economic, efficient and effective operation.
        One more go: let's agree to agree on that (for argument's sake).

        But in that case, Radio 3 should not also have had a disproportionate squeeze on its service licence budget - an 8.6% increase since 2006/7 whereas Radio 1 has had 35%; and Radio 2 and Radio 4 c. 25%.
        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

        Comment

        • Honoured Guest

          The BBC Trust and Management based their decisions on the relative merits of the parties' cases. Obviously, the squeeze was proportionate to those merits.

          Comment

          • jean
            Late member
            • Nov 2010
            • 7100

            You keep talking about cases being argued, and subsequently decided, on their merits.

            As far as I can see, all this means is that whatever decisions are reached can by that very fact be proved to have merit.

            If it means anything else, please elaborate.

            Comment

            • DracoM
              Host
              • Mar 2007
              • 12956

              Brilliant, jean!! Too right.

              Comment

              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                Host
                • Nov 2010
                • 20569

                Originally posted by Honoured Guest View Post
                The BBC Trust and Management based their decisions on the relative merits of the parties' cases. Obviously, the squeeze was proportionate to those merits.
                That sounds like the final sentence of a BBC teletext report - usually an unsubstantiated response by the government - like "Teaching has never been more attractive" following a report that teachers are leaving in droves.

                Comment

                • Honoured Guest

                  Originally posted by jean View Post
                  You keep talking about cases being argued, and subsequently decided, on their merits.

                  As far as I can see, all this means is that whatever decisions are reached can by that very fact be proved to have merit.

                  If it means anything else, please elaborate.
                  No, nothing else. Just that any decision is reached by considering the options, and their benefits and drawbacks - not by every party drawing a line around itself and shrieking: I'm inviolable and cannot be allowed to change. The new integrated BBC Music, with a Head of Music, should make that much simpler. Radio 3 and classical music will be operating in the same pool as all the other BBC music. If the Government slashes the licence fee in the next settlement, a Head of Music can fight the corner of the whole of BBC Music internally, and can draw up plans for managing an overall reduced budget quite easily because the competing demands of all music will already be overseen by that one person. A bit like Radio 3 reinvesting in the Proms, which benefitted both but would have been messier to achieve when Radio 3 and the Proms saw themselves as separate competing departments.

                  Comment

                  • Russ

                    Very much agree with Dracs' forebodings in his #137. Although the debate on the 'R3 Controller' v 'Proms Controller' roles is a crucial one, there is a danger of that debate disproportionately dominating the general non-music arts function/purpose of R3.

                    Russ

                    Comment

                    • Paul Sherratt

                      >>Controller of Radio 2 and Radio 6 Music to become Director of Music. Hmmm

                      Well his knowledge of music has been aided by his ( then ) young teenage daughters.

                      But under BS 6Music has certainly moved in to more interesting areas than under the previous ghastly boss.

                      Comment

                      • Eine Alpensinfonie
                        Host
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 20569

                        Originally posted by Honoured Guest View Post
                        Just that any decision is reached by considering the options, and their benefits and drawbacks - not by every party drawing a line around itself and shrieking: I'm inviolable and cannot be allowed to change.
                        What a hollow argument. No-one is resisting change. If we don't change, we cannot improve. But in changing, we should aspire to become better. Corporation-speak will not achieve that.

                        Comment

                        • BLUESNIK'S REVOX
                          Full Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 4270

                          "What we need is a great big melting pot, to fit the world and all its got" ~ Blue Mink.

                          "Learn how to remove all those ugly sharp edges on your genres" ~ Woodworking Weekly.

                          Comment

                          • Richard Tarleton

                            A moment of light relief: today's Times (TMS, the Times Diary) observes that RW was
                            one of the BBCS's biggest claimers of expenses, racking up £43,000 in four years from 2009, much of which was for hotel rooms during the Proms. His staff will miss his generosity: between 2010 and 2012 he claimed almost £3000 for lunches to thank those who were on his Proms team. He'll have to take his largesse now to Aldeburgh fish and chip shop (closed Mondays)

                            Comment

                            • Flosshilde
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 7988

                              Originally posted by Honoured Guest View Post
                              If the Government slashes the licence fee in the next settlement, a Head of Music can fight the corner of the whole of BBC Music internally, and can draw up plans for managing an overall reduced budget quite easily because the competing demands of all music will already be overseen by that one person.
                              This is pure nonsense. Once the Head of Music has agreed to a reduced budget, there will still be competition between Radio 1, 2, 3, 6 & whoever else, or between pop, rock, classical (with all its sub-divisions), jazz, world etc etc. The new post seems to be just another layer of management, doing a job that is already being done (or that is unneccessary). A typical management response to a problem (not that there is one) - if in doubt, throw another management post at it.

                              Comment

                              • mercia
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 8920

                                Telegraph open thread (what's that ? ) - "How would you change Radio 3 ?" - 3 comments and counting
                                Open thread: Radio 3 controller Roger Wright has left the BBC. Will you miss him? Or is this a chance for Radio Three to change for the better?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X