Originally posted by Alain Maréchal
View Post
Ravel's Bolero
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostBut first published in 2010 (see the note at the end of the item).
Insiders at Gramophone would, surely, have heard the rumours well before 2010. One Montreal journalist has stood up and admitted "everyone knew" but chose to ignore it, including himself:
Former OSM conductor was integral to the livelihood of people who preferred not to look too hard at the person behind the performance
One female journalist in 1995 was "pawed", with tape recorder on, she wrote it up in a reputable magazine. No one said they thought she made it up, but just seemed to take it as acceptable behaviour from "the maestro"!
And he's still getting top jobs where his abuse of power can continue:
Last edited by Mal; 27-06-19, 10:28.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mal View PostThe first incident, according to Wikipedia, happened back in 1985 and involved Sylvia McNair, a two-time Grammy Award-winning soprano.
Insiders at Gramophone would, surely, have heard the rumours well before 2010. One Montreal journalist has stood up and admitted "everyone knew" but chose to ignore it, including himself:
Former OSM conductor was integral to the livelihood of people who preferred not to look too hard at the person behind the performance
One female journalist in 1995 was "pawed", with tape recorder on, she wrote it up in a reputable magazine. No one said they thought she made it up, but just seemed to take it as acceptable behaviour from "the maestro"!
And he's still getting top jobs where his abuse of power can continue:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/28/a...tra-opera.html
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostAnd this affects the quality of his Bolero in what way? ...
- https://www.inquirer.com/philly/ente...-20180111.html
With Bolero, there seem to be many good recordings to choose from that don't require accommodation to deep flaws in the conductor. I like to avoid everything that might drain away my pleasure. Listening to Dutoit will have me thinking "this guy abuses young women", repeatedly; this does not conduce to listening pleasure. Note, I am not being virtuous here. I am using a purely hedonistic argument!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mal View Post"Striving for equanimity might be a worthy goal — something along the lines of continuing to listen, but learning to listen with a new awareness of the capacity for great beauty and deep flaws to flow from the same human source. But it won't be easy. And by even having to consider such an accommodation, much of the pleasure is already draining away."
- https://www.inquirer.com/philly/ente...-20180111.html
With Bolero, there seem to be many good recordings to choose from that don't require accommodation to deep flaws in the conductor. I like to avoid everything that might drain away my pleasure. Listening to Dutoit will have me thinking "this guy abuses young women", repeatedly; this does not conduce to listening pleasure. Note, I am not being virtuous here. I am using a purely hedonistic argument!
Mal, I'm sorry if your research into salacious sex allegations from c.1875 tarnishes your enjoyment of Dutoit's performance of Bolero. It's thoughtful of you to disseminate the well-exposed tittle-tattle, in a discussion which might have benefited also from your thoughts on the relative merits of Dutoit's musical - as opposed to his alleged sexual - performance.
Leaving aside your "drained pleasure", how would you place Dutoit's Bolero? For me, it's "fair to average" with a flashy recording. Others I know think more highly of it.Last edited by Master Jacques; 27-06-19, 12:50.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mal View PostThe first incident, according to Wikipedia, happened back in 1985 and involved Sylvia McNair, a two-time Grammy Award-winning soprano.
Insiders at Gramophone would, surely, have heard the rumours well before 2010. One Montreal journalist has stood up and admitted "everyone knew" but chose to ignore it, including himself:
Former OSM conductor was integral to the livelihood of people who preferred not to look too hard at the person behind the performance
One female journalist in 1995 was "pawed", with tape recorder on, she wrote it up in a reputable magazine. No one said they thought she made it up, but just seemed to take it as acceptable behaviour from "the maestro"!
And he's still getting top jobs where his abuse of power can continue:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/28/a...tra-opera.html
Yes, it is a great shame, a complex matter from the POV of artistic achievement, but impossible for many of us to see the accused artist in the same light, once we've looked carefully at the evidence and tried our best to use our instincts-for-truth about it.
(And yes, I have experienced attempted sexual assault myself, more than once. Unwanted physical contact, worse to experience than you might think, especially in the workplace, has been a depressingly common experience for many).
If you saw the films about Michael Jackson, Leaving Neverland, earlier this year you'll know exactly what I mean. But his devotees can't bear to believe it; he is too deeply a part of their own identity.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View Post... a discussion which might have benefited also from your thoughts on the relative merits of Dutoit's musical ... performance... how would you place Dutoit's Bolero? For me, it's "fair to average" with a flashy recording...
Dutoit also sounded flashy to me, with his abused orchestra putting in a lack lustre performance. Good recording from Decca, and they're mostly in tune, so it's "barely acceptable", or would be until you take non-musical considerations into account. I prefer Jarvi/Detroit to Dutoit; it's not so flashy, and the players sound more involved, maybe they like their maestro. I'd place Jarvi at average to good.
But my only other recording of the Bolero is the winner: Karajan/BPO.
Played back-to-back with the opulent Decca & Chandos recordings of Dutoit and Jarvi I worried it might sound a bit old; but no, the sound quality stands up well in the "DG Originals" remaster. I was disappointed with the snare drum in Dutoit and Jarvi, too quiet at the beginning, and a bit sloppy; not with Karajan, it's really snappy, precise, and mesmerising. And the wind soloists! Best I've heard anywhere in any piece. The massed winds at the end sound like a chorus of banshees and angels, a quite other-worldly, scintillating effect. There are many other factors putting Karajan head, shoulders, and heart above the others... the harpist is superb, for example. But this is certainly one for the "don't like marmite" crowd to try, it turns what can be a mud wallow into a heavenly experience.
The professional critics tend to rave about Karajan's performance, which restores my faith in professional critics. Penguin give it a rosette, saying "Karajan's 1964 Bolero is a hypnotically gripping performance, with the Berlin philharmonic at the top of its form... the couplings on both discs show Karajan at his finest". I have the the coupling with Mussorgksy and Debussy:
Buy Ravel: Boléro / Debussy: La Mer / Mussorgsky: Pictures at an Exhibition (DG The Originals) by Herbert von Karajan, Berliner Philharmoniker from Amazon's Classical Music Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders.
Third ear also put Karajan at the top of the heap: "For refined sorcery and hypnotic mood, the palm probably goes to the famous 1964 recording by Karajan and the Berlin Philharmonic".
I like Third Ears summary of the qualities of different Boleros, suggesting it stands up to very varied treatment: Munch "hopped up", Bernstein "notably slinky", Boulez "comparatively dignified", Paray "very fast", Monteaux "beautiful". So maybe it's not just marmite? Maybe there's a Bolero spread to suit the taste of marmite haters? "Hypnotic sorcery" does it for me, so I'll stick with Karajan.Last edited by Mal; 28-06-19, 08:33.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mal View PostI like Third Ears summary of the qualities of different Boleros, suggesting it stands up to very varied treatment: Munch "hopped up", Bernstein "notably slinky", Boulez "comparatively dignified", Paray "very fast", Monteaux "beautiful". So maybe it's not just marmite? Maybe there's a Bolero spread to suit the taste of marmite haters? "Hypnotic sorcery" does it for me, so I'll stick with Karajan.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostGiven my liking of the NYPO Boulez and others' of the BPO Karajan, I'm looking forward to having time for a serious listen to BPO Boulez: will it capture the best of both?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mal View PostThe Third Ear reviewer lumps both Boulezs together under "dignified", and then raves about Karajan's "hypnotic sorcery". So don't raise hopes too high, but let us know how it goes...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostThe two Boulez versions are quite different in effect, both superb, and "dignity" is not what either of them are about, in my opinion. I start to feel uneasy about this Third Ear reviewer. I am interested in Pulcinella's thoughts on what he hears in Boulez and the BPO, though!
Patronal Festival at the Minster (good music today and tomorrow) and a friend's 70th birthday party on Sunday!
PS: Score has arrived: the Eulenberg edition that includes a recording (RPO/Leaper), so I've now got yet another version to listen to!
Comment
-
-
Philip Clark in Gramophone clearly did not like the Karajan and puts the boot into it. I was interested by his view on the Bernstein - sensible in all the right ways so I will have to get that one .
In the 1980s the Dutoit Montreal Ravel record’s were all the rage and very much recommended as the ones to have and therefore I am sure to a degree I am imprinted by those records.
Discovery of Monteux’s wonderful Daphnis and Chloe recording,however, showed me there was a lot more about Ravel.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostPhilip Clark in Gramophone clearly did not like the Karajan and puts the boot into it. I was interested by his view on the Bernstein - sensible in all the right ways so I will have to get that one .
In the 1980s the Dutoit Montreal Ravel record’s were all the rage and very much recommended as the ones to have and therefore I am sure to a degree I am imprinted by those records.
Discovery of Monteux’s wonderful Daphnis and Chloe recording,however, showed me there was a lot more about Ravel.
Nobody thus far has mentioned Martinon, whose EMI Bolero with the Paris Orchestra perhaps falls into a "worthwhile for the conducting more than the playing" category. Nothing he ever did is without interest, though: this version is perhaps more liltingly 'dancelike' than most, and refreshingly so. Listening to this one, I rather see Rignold's cover in my mind's eye!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostSnap - that recording made a difference in my feeling towards the ballet, and Ravel's orchestral work in general (before that I only had an old, mono Munch LP which usually only succeeded in irritating me.)
Nobody thus far has mentioned Martinon, whose EMI Bolero with the Paris Orchestra perhaps falls into a "worthwhile for the conducting more than the playing" category. Nothing he ever did is without interest, though: this version is perhaps more liltingly 'dancelike' than most, and refreshingly so. Listening to this one, I rather see Rignold's cover in my mind's eye!
Orchestra de Paris /Jean Martinon
A version paying fulsome homage to the Spanish roots of Boléro. Martinon cracks into the score like a bloodthirsty ritual. No room for slackening in the orchestral ranks.
Comment
-
Comment