Originally posted by Barbirollians
View Post
Our Summer BAL 16: Berlioz Harold in Italy
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostThat was my first into to the piece, but not for 40 years or so. Koussevitsky and Boston is my favorite historical recording.
I am forgetting the violist at present, but I think it was Trampler[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostPrimrose was the soloist with Koussevitsky (as he was with Toscanini and Munch).
I first heard the piece in concert when I was at University. Barenboim was touring with the Orchestre de Paris and Zuckerman was the violist. I still have the lp that was issued about the same time. That performance is very dull, a pale reflection of the concert.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostZukerman/OP/Barenboim was a CBS LP - as with a number of Barenboims recordings at the time on that label have not been issued on CD.r
Some of the recordings are listed in the first post here - http://www.gramophone.co.uk/forum/ge...970s-cbs-elgar
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dave2002 View PostThat's a shame, if true. It seems likely to me that many will not think the sound quality of some of those Barenboim recordings from CBS is/was particularly high, but I heard some tapes apparently taken from masters in the 1970s of some Barenboim recordings - though probably recorded in the UK with a British orchestra (LPO?), and the recordings sounded excellent on good equipment. Of course I may have "rose tinted" aural memory, but I doubt that I've heard much better SQ since. Partly that could be due to the equipment used, but at least it showed that at the time the recordings were OK - and my ears were younger too.
Some of the recordings are listed in the first post here - http://www.gramophone.co.uk/forum/ge...970s-cbs-elgar
OP
Comment
-
-
It is sadly possible for the original tapes to have deteriorated, making it hard to recover the audio quality of some of the originals. I hope that Sony have taken appropriate steps to preserve some of this material, such as digitising (high quality?) it decades ago, and also trying to keep the tapes in as good a condition as possible.
Running a recording company, particularly one specialising in classical music, might be hard. If run purely for profit, then companies with archive material can very legitimately just decide to dispose of it, or donate it to those with a copyright interest. There's perhaps not, however, much profit to be made out of classical music, which raises the issues of whether companies ought also to be responsible for preserving recordings for posterity, which could increase their costs still further.
It may also be the case that lengthening the time period for copyright might pretty much ensure that by the time recordings come out of copyright, there is no usable original material left with which to make acceptable new copies.
The motivations of those running recording companies are really quite odd, and the financial operations could be difficult.
Comment
-
Comment