Originally posted by Barbirollians
View Post
Our Summer BAL 59: Rimsky-Korsakov Scheherazade
Collapse
X
-
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostDaaah - da - daaaah di da daaaaaah di da ditdat ----- plink plonk
repeat until Feb 29th then insert
pom pom Paah pom pom Pee, pom pom Paah pom pom Pee; pom pom Paah pom pom Pee, pom pom Paah pom pom Pee
Then repeat the "Daah - da -daahs" again...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostDaaah - da - daaaah di da daaaaaah di da ditdat ----- plink plonk
repeat until Feb 29th then insert
pom pom Paah pom pom Pee, pom pom Paah pom pom Pee; pom pom Paah pom pom Pee, pom pom Paah pom pom Pee
Then repeat the "Daah - da -daahs" again until Easter.
Rhythmic interest? 3/10
Harmonic interest? 2/10
Structure? 2/10
The only point of vague interest is giving the lousy melody to a different instrument every time it appears - I think that there are much more interesting things one can do with an orchestra (even one with double woodwinds - or even less: witness Mozart's last four Symphonies).
I'll say no more - but I've disliked the work ever since I first heard it forty-five years ago, and have greatly enjoyed many movie scores that might have "imitated" it since (beggur! There goes my membership of the Snobbish Club - and I'd waited so long to get it). I used to quite like the Prince & Princess and the first section still appeals - but I can no longer eat a whole one. It is, for me, one of those works that initially I disliked, but over the years, it's got worse.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostA harsh opinion I must say. In fact I think I had better scuttle off and listen to it RIGHT NOW and see if I can work out exactly why I disagree.
I've just received a PM containing something I'll find much more to my taste
(Actually, considering what I've said about Scheherazade, that's less of a compliment than I intended.)
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostThanks, RFG. I still think that with the Beecham recording, where Borodin's Polovstian dances re the coupling, I think it's him, all he way through?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostDaaah - da - daaaah di da daaaaaah di da ditdat ----- plink plonk
repeat until Feb 29th then insert
pom pom Paah pom pom Pee, pom pom Paah pom pom Pee; pom pom Paah pom pom Pee, pom pom Paah pom pom Pee
Then repeat the "Daah - da -daahs" again until Easter.
Rhythmic interest? 3/10
Harmonic interest? 2/10
Structure? 2/10
The only point of vague interest is giving the lousy melody to a different instrument every time it appears ...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostEnjoy!. I would suggest that you listen to the refined textures of Immerseel's recording though - there's a lot of stuff in that which I hadn't really heard before.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View Postthe recycling of a limited range of ideas - which even you would have to admit are rather memorable, since you onomatopoeically wrote out a large proportion of the score in one of your posts!.
I would suggest that you listen to the refined textures of Immerseel's recording though - there's a lot of stuff in that which I hadn't really heard before.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostBut anything can become "memorable" if it's short enough and repeated frequently
Comment
-
Comment