By request I've merged the Platform 3 thread on Sir T with this one. Carry on ...
BaL 12.03.11 Recordings from Sir Thomas Beecham
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostEMI were notoriously slow off the starting blocks when it came to new technology (they were still producing 78's as late as 1958!).....
The earliest stereo EMI recording I know of is a Prokofiev disc from Nikolai Malko and the Philharmonia set down in 1955 and still, I believe, available on CD.
I would say that stereo did not become the norm until 1958.
Knowing that it was coming all the majors were recording regularly in stereo from about 1955, some a few months in late 1954. These early recordings used very simple methods and temperamental equipment which meant that sometimes complete releasable works in stereo were not possible. Toscanini's last concert with the NBCSO was made in stereo on 4th April 1954. Some stereo was made in Germany by the DRR on tape in 1944 with Karajan among others.
Beecham made a Boheme for RCA at the Manhattan Center NY in March and April 1956 using 2 track mono - voices on one track of a two track machine, orchestra on the other - - NOT stereo although some electronic stereo was released later [HMV SLS 896 LPs]. Probably didn't have a wide enough mixer for true stereo. However, EMI made a stereo Beethoven Mass in C with Beecham in Abbey Road between May 1956 and April 1958. EMI and Decca were recording regularly in stereo from about mid 1955 but Kenneth Wilkinson for example didn't start making stereo tapes until mid 1958, he did the monos and others the stereo.
According to the Philharmonia discography Klemperer did not make a stereo version of Hindemith Nobilissima Visione in October 1954 at Kingsway Hall [Hindemith did himself in November 1956 also at KH] but it is possible that an early stereo machine was present at the sessions which could have supplied a master for CD release.
Comment
-
-
Cellini
Originally posted by salymap View PostDave thank you so much for putting that thread from the old MBs on here. It makes me realise how I miss them,
I've forgotten how to access them but will have a go I think.
HS and I fell out frequently but I can't tell you how much I miss him and those others on these boards. There is hope that HS and smitims might decide to join us again of course. But the past is the past, and we can do nothing to bring it back, sadly.
Comment
-
A few from the past ....
1. This is where we discussed Beecham recordings -
The best of the BBC, with the latest news and sport headlines, weather, TV & radio highlights and much more from across the whole of BBC Online
2. ..... plus a few more on various Beecham related topics
The best of the BBC, with the latest news and sport headlines, weather, TV & radio highlights and much more from across the whole of BBC Online
The best of the BBC, with the latest news and sport headlines, weather, TV & radio highlights and much more from across the whole of BBC Online
The best of the BBC, with the latest news and sport headlines, weather, TV & radio highlights and much more from across the whole of BBC Online
Comment
-
-
StephenO
Originally posted by 3rd Viennese School View PostMy only Beecham is Tchaikovsky symphony no.4.
In F minor.
There's a picture of him on the cover smoking a cigar. WHY do they do that?
3VS
I can't really see that a photo of Tommy with a cigar is going to tempt the young and innocent into a lifetime of nicotine addiction.
Comment
-
Originally posted by salymap View PostOff topic, it seems fitting that this thread had a false start [sorry!] and part has been moved. Tommy himself was laid to rest in the beautiful wild Brookwood Cemetery near Guildford,where I visited his grave, but later moved to Limpsfield, I believe.
Does anyone in the SE stay put when they are "laid to rest"?
Comment
-
-
As I understand it, and amazing as it may seem, the Beecham Boheme was very much a last minute effort after other projects had fallen down while he was in America. The sessions were hastily organised and completed quite quickly. The studio used a 2 track machine,with the orchestra on one track and the voices on the other, so this was not stereo. The master was mixed from those tracks.
All this happened at short notice because Beecham's manager Andrew Schulhof realised that all the cast would be in New York at the same time, and seized the opportunity to set it up.
The Manhattan Centre was used on March 16th 1956, and subsequently between March 30th and April 6th, and the story goes that Victoria de los Angeles broke a journey to the airport to record some extra patches. I've taken this from the sleeve notes.
What does interest me is that the Manhattan Centre was used by Stokowski for his first stereo recordings, also in 1956, his selection from Prokofiev's Romeo and Juliet is one example, and the stereo is excellent, so the Beecham Boheme must have been a missed opportunity for some reason.
Why
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ferretfancy View PostAs I understand it, and amazing as it may seem, the Beecham Boheme was very much a last minute effort after other projects had fallen down while he was in America. The sessions were hastily organised and completed quite quickly. The studio used a 2 track machine,with the orchestra on one track and the voices on the other, so this was not stereo. The master was mixed from those tracks.
All this happened at short notice because Beecham's manager Andrew Schulhof realised that all the cast would be in New York at the same time, and seized the opportunity to set it up.
The Manhattan Centre was used on March 16th 1956, and subsequently between March 30th and April 6th, and the story goes that Victoria de los Angeles broke a journey to the airport to record some extra patches. I've taken this from the sleeve notes.
What does interest me is that the Manhattan Centre was used by Stokowski for his first stereo recordings, also in 1956, his selection from Prokofiev's Romeo and Juliet is one example, and the stereo is excellent, so the Beecham Boheme must have been a missed opportunity for some reason.
Why
Comment
-
-
I could not disagree more about Beecham. He founded the RPO and co-founded the LPO, did an enormous amount for British musical life in the first half of the C20, including raising the reputation of Covent Garden internationally as both conductor and impresario. As Cowan remarked, he spent a lot of time on preparatory work for his performances and recordings, to ensure that the phrasing and articulation that he wanted were understood by the players. It is the quality of this phrasing, together with the clarity of the sound, that marks so many of his outstanding recordings. He programmed many new works, and in the early part of his career almost bankrupted himself by perversely programming works that would not bring in audiences - that is hardly the style of a 'self-indulgent man on a career long vanity project'.
To my mind he was one of the greatest contributors to the musical life of this country, and also one of its finest conductors (and one of the finest of any country).
Comment
-
Comment