Originally posted by Barbirollians
View Post
BaL 12.10.13 - Walton's Violin Concerto
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostI suppose nothing shows us more than BAL about how subjective record reviewing is . The 2002 winner Bell was dismissed without a note even being played !Originally posted by mikealdren View PostAnd justifiably too. I listened to it again after the programme and I heard none of the of spirit of the work in his dull efficient playing.Originally posted by gurnemanz View PostBell had also previously received the 1998 Gramophone Award for Best Concerto Recording and was top recommendation in the the last Penguin Guide I bought (2003/4)
I've always been happy with the Bell... Need to give it another spin.
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ardcarp View PostCan anyone comment on Thomas Bowes' playing with the Malmo SO? The reviewer seemed a bit fixed on this performance, but from what I heard neither the playing nor the violin sound was in the same league as that of say Nigel Kennedy or Ida Haendel.Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostThe Bowes recording he raved about sounded cloudy to me and nothing to write home about at all
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Caliban View PostThe first extract he played from that performance started with a passage that seemed to my ears to have some teeth-itching intonation issues.
Surprising from the former leader of the impressive Magginis...[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
I am very pleased that Tamsin Little "won" - and deservedly so. However, there are clearly many great recordings of this understatedly brilliant work, and it was good to listen to a BaL that was so well-BaLanced. My only grouse is that I got the distinct impression that NK was not particularly favoured by the reviewer from the start, which was confirmed when he intimated that his recording is "without the usual antics" (whatever that means; I am guessing he means the fact that he doesn't perform dressed as an undertaker) and the comment about the "vulgarity" of his portamento (I think he said 'portamento') was the perfect excuse to ditch him completely. I like NK's recording - vulgar bit or not!
PS by well-balanced I refer to the extracts that WERE played; plenty were not played that should have been - Bell being a case in point.
Comment
-
-
Having played the Chung/Previn recording in the car on the way to visit friends this evening his dismissal of it seems even more remarkable than before - her playing is dazzling and that horn solo does not sound a problem at all in context .
The criticism that it was grainy is just bizarre .
Comment
-
-
Long time since I played the Chung but I remember it for its dazzling sense of Mediterranean warmth; one of the reasons why for many years I preferred this concerto to the one for viola.
I sometimes wonder what checks are done on a reviewer's system to ensure they are listening in the best possible sound. I don't know if anyone remembers a feature in Gramophone where listeners and some of the reviewers had their systems checked out by an audio specialist; it led to the revelation that several suffered from decidedly average equipment; probably one of the reasons why the series was hastily ditched! I have always taken pronouncements on sound quality with several spoonfuls of salt since then.
Comment
-
-
I had always assumed reviewers knew a bit about the technical side of recording...and had decent kit to use. Does the Beeb provide it for them? Rob Cowan seems particularly knowledgeable in matters of recorded sound, re-masterings and the techniques of recoerding companies and their engineers.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostYes, I was expecting to be wowed, too. Their NAXOS Walton String Quartet/Piano Quintet is very good.
It's very impressive how consistently good their recordings have been over a long period with a variety of different leaders.
Mike
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ardcarp View PostI had always assumed reviewers knew a bit about the technical side of recording...and had decent kit to use. Does the Beeb provide it for them? Rob Cowan seems particularly knowledgeable in matters of recorded sound, re-masterings and the techniques of recording companies and their engineers.
Mike
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by visualnickmos View PostMy only grouse is that I got the distinct impression that NK was not particularly favoured by the reviewer from the start, which was confirmed when he intimated that his recording is "without the usual antics" (whatever that means; I am guessing he means the fact that he doesn't perform dressed as an undertaker) and the comment about the "vulgarity" of his portamento (I think he said 'portamento') was the perfect excuse to ditch him completely. I like NK's recording - vulgar bit or not!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mikealdren View PostWithout wishing to denegrate Tom's playing in any way, he left the Maggini long before they recorded the Walton.
It's very impressive how consistently good their recordings have been over a long period with a variety of different leaders.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sir Velo View PostIIRC, Kennedy's recording of the violin and viola concertos with Previn and the LSO were Gramophone award winners back in the day....
Originally posted by Sir Velo View Post....Either tastes have changed or the performance has unaccountably deteriorated in the intervening years...
Comment
-
Comment