BaL 7.04.12 - Bach's St Matthew Passion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BBMmk2
    Late Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 20908

    #46
    Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
    Not directly from the River folk, Bbm, but through their "Links":

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Bach-Matthew.../dp/B00004R8MD
    Ah, thank you for that Ferney! I rather enjoyed the way Summerly portrayed this. Indeed I think that the piano ;laying was sensitive to.
    Don’t cry for me
    I go where music was born

    J S Bach 1685-1750

    Comment

    • silvestrione
      Full Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 1725

      #47
      Originally posted by Caliban View Post

      I enjoyed the BAL and couldn't put my more detailed reactions any better than that, vindemesse I was thinking it was one of those BALs that could have done with the full hour sometimes accorded, to allow for consideration of Herreweghe et al.
      My feelings exactly. It started as an inspiring programme, really illuminating on the history of the recordings of the piece; we were deep into 'Erbarme dich', and I was just anticipating a contralto version, and wondering which one he'd choose, and then suddenly we moved on, vast swathes of the music were not considered, and the programme was all over.

      Comment

      • MickyD
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 4832

        #48
        I agree, it almost felt like an abridged version of a longer programme. I certainly didn't like the final choice and was surprised to hear a harpsichord clanging away in the background of what is one of the newest HIP recordings - is this now considered authentic in this work?

        Comment

        • BBMmk2
          Late Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 20908

          #49
          Now you mentioned it, Silvestrione, yes,there were vast tracts of music thatwas not considered when other reviewerrs, were considering other music. It left me rather empty?
          Don’t cry for me
          I go where music was born

          J S Bach 1685-1750

          Comment

          • kuligin
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 231

            #50
            A long work like this really needs an " interpretations on record" type of programme

            i thought the approach of a run through the history of recordings was the best approach even if I was not totally convinced by the winner.

            I am not sure being told that this is the greatest Christian work ever, because " it just is" added much. And I am glad the reviewers fantasy recording with Sting as Evangalist is unlikely to occur, but then I thought it was unlikely any serious reviewer would admire that attempt at Dowland....

            Comment

            • rank_and_file

              #51
              Sorry to go off topic somewhat, but I looked on YouTube to see if anyone had posted the John Butt version. Could not see it but I did find the 1990 St John Passion by Kuijken and La Petite Band with Cristoph Pregardien as a wonderful evangelist posted as one complete file. Scholl looking very young.

              Seems YouTube have changed their uploading rules to allow much longer complete files - 1 hour 50 mins in this case!

              I think the SMP with Richter is there now posted in just two files.

              Comment

              • silvestrione
                Full Member
                • Jan 2011
                • 1725

                #52
                Originally posted by kuligin View Post
                A long work like this really needs an " interpretations on record" type of programme

                i thought the approach of a run through the history of recordings was the best approach even if I was not totally convinced by the winner.

                I am not sure being told that this is the greatest Christian work ever, because " it just is" added much. And I am glad the reviewers fantasy recording with Sting as Evangalist is unlikely to occur, but then I thought it was unlikely any serious reviewer would admire that attempt at Dowland....
                So he DID say Sting...I assumed I'd misheard.

                Comment

                • Nick Armstrong
                  Host
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 26575

                  #53
                  Originally posted by kuligin View Post

                  I am not sure being told that this is the greatest Christian work ever, because " it just is" added much. And I am glad the reviewers fantasy recording with Sting as Evangalist is unlikely to occur, but then I thought it was unlikely any serious reviewer would admire that attempt at Dowland....
                  I think Mr Summerly is somewhat of a tease...
                  "...the isle is full of noises,
                  Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                  Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                  Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                  Comment

                  • Eine Alpensinfonie
                    Host
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 20575

                    #54
                    I listened to the selection this morning, and I really cannot see the purpose of one-to-a-part performances. There's so little variety of timbres, and in such a long work, this for me is important.

                    Comment

                    • BBMmk2
                      Late Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 20908

                      #55
                      Quite so EA. The St matthew passion of JSB, is to meapiece of'SacredDrama'. Unfoilds before us and so needs a variety of timbres. The larger scalkeversions of Herreweghe's andJEGs and now Rattle's, espeicially Rattles, exemplyfies this, imo.
                      Don’t cry for me
                      I go where music was born

                      J S Bach 1685-1750

                      Comment

                      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                        Gone fishin'
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 30163

                        #56
                        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                        I listened to the selection this morning, and I really cannot see the purpose of one-to-a-part performances. There's so little variety of timbres, and in such a long work, this for me is important.
                        Well, there are several performances on record that use bigger choirs. For those of us who prefer Bach's intentions (for its intimacy and greater variety of timbres than the homogenous mush of bigger choirs ) there are but three OVpP recordings. Butt's sounded a little too close-mic-ed to me as I listened this morning; so it's going to be either McCreesh or Kuijken for me.
                        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                        Comment

                        • Eine Alpensinfonie
                          Host
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 20575

                          #57
                          Bach's intentions? Maybe. They did have choirs in those days. Bach sang in one when he was young. Is there any need to over-egg the argument by referring to over-large mushy choirs?

                          Comment

                          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                            Gone fishin'
                            • Sep 2011
                            • 30163

                            #58
                            Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                            Is there any need to over-egg the argument by referring to over-large mushy choirs?
                            YES: When somebody else has got egg on their face with such comments as "There's so little variety of timbres"!
                            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                            Comment

                            • Tony Halstead
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 1717

                              #59
                              It's a shame that JS didn't have time to mention the wonderful JEG recording.
                              Although now slightly 'venerable' ( recorded in 1988) for me it 'ticks all the right boxes' with superb soloists and a 'beatific' choir.

                              Comment

                              • Barbirollians
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 11763

                                #60
                                Sounds like a disappointing BAL .

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X