It does rather seem like both a missed opportunity, and a lazy way out...
BaL 4.02.12 - Rachmaninov's Symphony no. 2 in E minor
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by mikealdren View PostAlternatively, it would be fun to hear a golden oldie broadcast from the archive, something long gone"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
amateur51
I must admit that my original idea was a post that scolded all the moaning minnies, chiding BBC for a mishap. Oh the joy of doing someone else's job .
However I thought I'd be practical instead
This might have been the opportunity to take a recent BaL (for the reasons that Panyan has given) and to turn it into an Innocent Ear experiment - I can't remember what the French radio equivalent of BaL is but that does strike me as an interesting extension/variation on the BaL format.
I don't mind the route that R3 has chosen, as I find radio repeats don't pall like TV repeats do - my brain (!).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostInteresting as it is to hear this programme again, the element of excitement is lost when we already know the outcome.
Comment
-
-
Don Petter
Originally posted by rauschwerk View PostTo me the extraordinary thing is that it's available as a podcast along with 75 other reviews. Surely there can be very few people to whom that is unavailable?
Comment
-
Panjandrum
Originally posted by Don Petter View PostWhile not defending such repeats (which seem like a cheap cop-out to me), I do have several musical friends who, even if they do have computers, wouldn't even know what a podcast was.
Comment
-
amateur51
Originally posted by Panjandrum View PostThe station itself has advised me, in some correspondence we've been having, that I would be better off listening to podcasts or catching up with programmes on the iplayer than listening to the nausea-inducing garbage that is Breakfast. The assumption is, therefore, that we do all know what podcasts are, and for those who don't, tough!
I never listen to it now and Through The Night is a much better alternative
Comment
-
amateur51
Well I enjoyed re-listening to Mr Mival's exploration and found myself being persuaded to get the Weller performance because it offers an 'alternative' view, as Mival says, a brisker, riskier approach, even if the risks don't always come off completely - we shall see
Maybe the morning sunshine had something to do with it too
Comment
-
Originally posted by amateur51 View PostWell I enjoyed re-listening to Mr Mival's exploration and found myself being persuaded to get the Weller performance because it offers an 'alternative' view, as Mival says, a brisker, riskier approach, even if the risks don't always come off completely - we shall see
Comment
-
-
amateur51
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThat's interesting. I was persuaded to go for the LSO/Rozhdestvensky by Mr Mival's review. That's the great thing about BaL. You don't have to be bound by the final recommendation, but it does help you with the choice.
The Weller seems to offer a different more energetic risky view.
But I agree EA - that's the magic of BaL when it's done well
Comment
Comment