Originally posted by cloughie
View Post
BaL 4.02.12 - Rachmaninov's Symphony no. 2 in E minor
Collapse
X
-
amateur51
-
Originally posted by Nachtigall View PostHaven't listened to the Second Symphony for a long time but, like others here, wouldn't want to be without either the LSO/Previn or Concertgebouw/Ashkenazy. I appear also to have the Philadelphia/Ormandy and RPO/Litton recordings as well as the BBCNOW/Tadaaki Otawa but couldn't say what these were like offhand.
The recording I'm most attached to for sentimental, nostalgic reasons is the DG of Kurt Sanderling and the Leningrad Philharmonic, issued in 1956 and reissued on DG Originals, a mono only recording but still very good, a dark-hued, lush and classy performance. I remember using it as the basis for a talk to a Sixth Form music class when I was a mere teenager.
Comment
-
-
I noticed this on Amazon: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Rachmaninov-...7971966&sr=8-5
I imagine the Amazon operative who wrote the heading listens to CFM (or maybe to Breakfast) too often. Stravinsky: Symphony In Three Parts, anyone?
Comment
-
-
Like others I enjoy the Previn EMI version and quite like the Pappano, although the latter is rather spoiled for me by the typical EMI "up front", close miked, live recording which lacks atmosphere. This procedure also ruins, for me, many of the Rattle/BPO recordings, although I suppose they are produced this way to cut out any audience noise. I am also very fond of the RCA Ormandy and the DGG Sanderling CDs and, for the "cut" versions, I prefer the Sony Ormandy and the 1968 Svetlanov.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by reinerfan View PostLike others I enjoy the Previn EMI version and quite like the Pappano, although the latter is rather spoiled for me by the typical EMI "up front", close miked, live recording which lacks atmosphere. This procedure also ruins, for me, many of the Rattle/BPO recordings, although I suppose they are produced this way to cut out any audience noise. I am also very fond of the RCA Ormandy and the DGG Sanderling CDs and, for the "cut" versions, I prefer the Sony Ormandy and the 1968 Svetlanov.
Comment
-
-
amateur51
Not an enormously illuminating BaL but quite satisfactory. I was delighted to make an acquaintance with the recording by Weller/LPO in the early 70s - I saw/heard Weller conducting it at the Royal Festival Hall in London around the mid-80s I think and it was a much better performance than I was expecting (it was very good); and hearing this morning's programme made me want to hear his recording - a part of what BaL is all about, I think
Comment
-
Mahlerei
PJPJ
Listening to Previn/LSO in the 3rd and as good as the performance is it's typical of so many EMI transfers from this period - a razored treble and a general brightness that makes for hard listening. By comparison their RCA Nielsen 1 transferred from LP is wonderfully warm and involving.
Comment
-
Originally posted by amateur51 View PostWas that consideration part of William Mival's brief?
I was pleased to hear the Rozhdestvensky get a good review- I am fond of the Rachmaninov and Tchaikovsky records he made for Pickwick in the 1980s.
Comment
-
Comment