Originally posted by Biffo
View Post
BaL 10.12.11 - Handel's Julius Caesar
Collapse
X
-
I would not be so damning generally . I rather liked that Tristan at the ROH though I think it is far to say it was appallingly blocked if you were on the right of the auditorium . I have generally enjoyed McVicar's productions as well though his messing about with the running order in Faust and cutting the spinning scene annoyed me . Laurent pelly's La Fille du Regiment is genius and greatly enhances the piece.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostWhat a thoroughly "musical" performance this is.
But performances by Sir Charles have been 'historically informed' - on modern instruments, agreed. So when did the rot set in - more recently than 1984?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post... the tendency of many reviewers to dismiss any baroque recordings (however good they may be) that are not deemed to be HIPP.
The fact is that when faced with a combination of phenomenal Musicianship such as encountered on the Mackerras/Baker recording, it overwhelms the reservations about language, keys and instrumentation that one might have: it is a recording that reveals the great contribution to Human Civilization that Handel's opera is.
Best Wishes.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Biffo
Sir Charles Mackerras has been a practitioner of HIP long before it was called that. In his period as director of the Hamburg State Opera (1965-69) he performed Handel operas and re-introduced ornamentation etc. He continued this with SW/ENO, not just in Handel but also in Mozart. I suppose the difference was that he was always pragmatic, sensible and above all musical.
Comment
-
It's a shame we heard so little of the Mackerras/ENO performance in Monday morning's Essential Classics slot - not much more than 20 minutes by my reckoning (from an opera that runs for 4 hours). Surely a proper amount of time should be set aside for the recommended BaL version on Monday - it's not as though much else is being sacrificed.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Biffo View PostSir Charles Mackerras has been a practitioner of HIP long before it was called that. In his period as director of the Hamburg State Opera (1965-69) he performed Handel operas and re-introduced ornamentation etc. He continued this with SW/ENO, not just in Handel but also in Mozart.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Biffo View PostI suppose the difference was that he was always pragmatic, sensible and above all musical.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostThe "difference" with whom, Biffo? Who would you say is "unpragmatic", foolish and above all "unmusical"?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by verismissimo View PostIf one said "flexible" or "inclusive", one could nominate several on both sides who are not. And others, like Mackerras, who travel both sides of the road - Rattle, Elder, Jurowski, Harnoncourt among them.
I totally agree.
"If"!
Best Wishes to all, however you like your Handel.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Biffo
If you want a prime example of modish one-to-a-part-lets-sing-it as-fast-as-we-can try McCreesh' s recording of the Bach Magnificat - an anti-musical gabble. A shame because McCreesh has done some recordings.
Comment
-
Alf-Prufrock
Originally posted by Biffo View PostIf you want a prime example of modish one-to-a-part-lets-sing-it as-fast-as-we-can try McCreesh' s recording of the Bach Magnificat - an anti-musical gabble. A shame because McCreesh has done some recordings.
Comment
-
It's something of a pity that while Handel's operas have enjoyed a tremendous revival in the last two decades or so, the same has not been true of the oratorios (excepting of course Messiah) - and yet they deserve to be better known.
Comment
-
Comment