I haven't heard the Hanover Band/Goodman 5th for ages and must rectify that. His 9th, if I remember correctly, is admired by many, including members of this forum.
BaL 22.04.23 - Schubert: Symphony no. 5 in B flat D. 485
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ostuni View PostAre you thinking of Natasha Loges? As far as I know, Sarah Devonald has no particular expertise in Lieder: she's an oboist and an ex-R3 producer.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Darloboy View PostI have Beecham, COE/Abbado, OAE/Mackerras, Staatskapelle Dresden/Colin Davis and LCP/Norrington in my collection. I don't think I need another.
New York Philharmonic Orchestra, Leonard Bernstein
London Classical Players, Roger Norrington
Hanover Band, Roy Goodman
LPO Beecham (1938)
NBC Symphony Orchestra, Arturo Toscanini
Australian Chamber Orchestra, Charles Mackerras
Chamber Orchestra of Europe, Claudio Abbado
Staatskapelle Dresden, Herbert Blomstedt
Moscow Chamber Orchestra, Rudolf Barshai
Staatskapelle Dresden, Wolfgang Sawallisch
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostI pulled Blomstedt/Dresden off the shelf yesterday. You certainly could do worse than that. Hugely enjoyable
The andante is like a sleepy summer song in the meadow; it seems not to want to end, and you'll wish it hadn't. He doesn't let too much go in the scherzo, but the finale is an exhilarating whirlwind. (Similar approach to the Brahms 2nd Serenade in the same program, if anything an even more lovable performance with the finale bubbling over with gleefully laughing winds! (As if released by having no violins around to obscure their festive artistry...).
Gardiner sees the 5th's symphonic world whole, but the grains of sand are never expressively undersold.
It would be great if listeners here would revisit their favourites to see if they stand up to their later ears. Perhaps playing a completely unfamiliar, newer recording before the retrospect, one from an artist they may not usually approach or admire. (Belatedly, I might try one of the Bohm tapings next...or Klemperer - any excuse to pull out a Toshiba UHQ....)
Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 19-02-23, 03:28.
Comment
-
-
I was disappointed in the Philharmonia/Klemperer (Toshiba-EMI CD, rec.1963). The repeat-less 1st movement is soon over, yet with its plodding steadiness of tempo it outstays its welcome; my mind was wandering even by the development, which seems far too short itself, without the expo repeat, before the recap begins: two statements with a mere linking interlude between them.
There's hardly any yielding to rubato here, or much dynamic variation either, and this hardly changes through the andante or minuet. My heart sank as the finale began: it was never going to take off at that easy-going pulse. The Philharmonia's string section sounds quite sizeable which may mitigate against such subtleties, but some beautiful playing from them and the wind soloists was little consolation.
(A quick spot-check with Gardiner was perhaps unfair, but all-too-revealing: such character and individuality in those delicate little turns and shaded levels, in a different league for a vivacious, melodically smiling, joyfully dancing realisation of the Schubertian idiom).Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 18-02-23, 21:07.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Keraulophone View Post.
Sir Thomas Beecham's Schubert 3 & 5 with the RPO - sparkling with wit, elan, elegance, chartacterful woodwind solos and that recognisable Beechamesqe quality possibly brought about by a couple of White Lady cocktails before the sessions.
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Keraulophone View Post.
Sir Thomas Beecham's Schubert 3 & 5 with the RPO - sparkling with wit, elan, elegance, chartacterful woodwind solos and that recognisable Beechamesqe quality possibly brought about by a couple of White Lady cocktails before the sessions.
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostI was disappointed in the Philharmonia/Klemperer (Toshiba-EMI CD, rec.1963). The repeat-less 1st movement is soon over, yet with its plodding steadiness of tempo it outstays its welcome; my mind was wandering even by the development, which seems far too short itself, without the expo repeat, before the recap begins: two statements with a mere linking interlude between them.
There's hardly any yielding to rubato here, or much dynamic variation either, and this hardly changes through the andante or minuet. My heart sank as the finale began: it was never going to take off at that easy-going pulse. The Philharmonia's string section sounds quite sizeable which may mitigate against such subtleties, but some beautiful playing from them and the wind soloists was little consolation.
(A quick spot-check with Gardiner was perhaps unfair, but all-too-revealing: such character and individuality in those delicate little turns and shaded levels, in a different league for a vivacious, melodically smiling, joyfully dancing realisation of the Schubertian idiom).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostTo each their own -I couldn’t disagree more.
Or sit up straight, take a deep breath - and find your way to one of Michi Gaigg's radical realisations. The earlier on DHM (L'Orfeo Barockorchester/Gaigg/16/44.1/CD) is the mellower; probably one of the smallest orchestras on record in this music, but still portrays the piece with startling dynamic, phrasal and textural contrast. Perhaps only a small group of such closely bonded players and director can achieve that degree of inner life and outer vivacity.
Playing now, and even better than I recalled....very distinctive, with exceptional recorded sound, so present and lifelike...how those horns in the andante can bark and rasp, then sing it to sleep so sweetly.....really wonderful!
Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 19-02-23, 03:26.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by RichardB View PostI think I've heard most if not all of the period instrument recordings (current favourite being Michi Gaigg and L'Orfeo Barockorchester).
Comment
-
Comment