Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben
View Post
BaL 14.01.23 - Prokofiev: Violin Concerto no. 2
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostI'm not at home at present (or have other access) so need to check later, but I don't think that the Stern/Philadelphia/Ormandy version that I have has such a purgative effect!
Chung sadly not considered.
Comment
-
-
A great piece but surely shaded by the genius of Noel Coward's 'There are bad times just around the corner' -John Rutter's current earworm in the preceding part of the programme.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gradus View PostA great piece but surely shaded by the genius of Noel Coward's 'There are bad times just around the corner' -John Rutter's current earworm in the preceding part of the programme.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX-pUFPTN6E"The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
I certainly agree with the comments about Ehnes, technically superb but rather faceless. However I don't don't see the similarity to Bell who I find less technically assured and with a tendency to be over indulgent.
The Stern I have is the earlier (Bernstein) version - not good - and my Mullova version is the earlier Previn version. He did mention Shaham and never really explained why he had rejected it. In fact he didn't seem to summarise why he didn't like the Mullova, Jansen or the Batiashvili either or even why he rejected the Kopatchinskaja. The latter is not a safe library choice but it's by far the most interesting version.
Comment
-
-
One of the (I suppose inevitable) features is when a new version gets introduced favourably near the end of the discussion with no comment about how that version fared up to that point.
In this case, iirc, Mullova's third movement was used, but we don't know if she passed the tests for the first two movements.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostThirded!
Quite taken by Mintz on the little bit played this morning. Heifetz is superb, and I like Shaham’s recording very much. I thought the BaL this morning was a bit of a muddle, particularly at the end where it was all unceremoniously wrapped up and brought to a very hasty conclusion.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostI don’t really get James Ehnes . He is like Joshua Bell for me - plays wonderfully but doesn’t really ever move me.
He has close connections with the BBC Phil I think like Gernon. Perhaps you get to prefer recordings by soloists you know and have worked with ?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostChung sadly not considered.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by underthecountertenor View PostAnd are great mates with, apparently.
https://twitter.com/GernonBen/status...B-wjGPWQnv_dXg
Is it what the politicians would call a conflict of interest? My answer would be 'yes'. At the very least it makes the reviewer's choice of little value."The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostI'm surprised more hasn't been made of this.
Is it what the politicians would call a conflict of interest? My answer would be 'yes'.
On a wider note I worry about the tendency to get professional musicians ( especially conductors with their unique power ) to do music and record reviews . There has to be some conflict unless it’s a radically different field from theirs . So for example Joanna McGregor on The Tchaikovsky piano concerto was fine.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sir Velo View PostJust played the Chung this morning to see if memory had played tricks but, no, still as exciting and fresh as the day it was set down in the studio. Previn and the LSO provide superb accompaniment. c/w an equally stunning 1st concerto and the Stravinsky. No issues with sound quality so why the neglect on BAL?
Comment
-
Comment