Originally posted by Wolfram
View Post
BaL 24.12.22 - Beethoven: Symphony no. 9 in D minor
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostBut I'm not sure about the quality of the "insights", which seemed to me verbal rhapsodies rather than analytically-argued perceptions drawn from what we were hearing. Why not (for example) go into how differing speeds of the Turkish March change what the music conveys, socio-politically? Such things do matter.
Rather it seemed to me - and I'm a TS admirer - to be one of those cases where he was opening his mouth before getting his brain in gear.
Just listening to the first Chicago/Solti - and much enjoying it.
Comment
-
-
I enjoyed the discussion and thought TS made some interesting thought-provoking points. For me the Furtwangler performances were extraordinary and his ultra-slow speed for the slow movement in the 1942 recording was compelling. I've always disliked super-fast rushes to the finish in the finale so WF's supercharged triumphalist speed was awful not to mention the thought that this took place in front of that audience. I much prefer Klemperer's approach and his audiences.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gradus View PostI enjoyed the discussion and thought TS made some interesting thought-provoking points. For me the Furtwangler performances were extraordinary and his ultra-slow speed for the slow movement in the 1942 recording was compelling. I've always disliked super-fast rushes to the finish in the finale so WF's supercharged triumphalist speed was awful not to mention the thought that this took place in front of that audience. I much prefer Klemperer's approach and his audiences.
Perhaps someone else can provide more information?
Of course, it can never be a library choice, but is nevertheless a vital and important document in the interpretive history of the 'Choral'."The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by visualnickmos View PostThat's as may be, but it's far removed from the notion of BaL, making it one of the worst BaLs I can recall.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostHave to disagree. Although TS may be verbose and periphrastic (see he’s got me doing it) the intellectual level of this was way above a normal BAL. It’s right I think not just to look at this work as pure music . He could easily expanded to consider Schiiler and the Enlightenment, the line that leads through that to The Third Reich, the fall of Berlin Wall and the failure , in John Gray’s words, of the Enlightenment project. Beethoven’s Ninth has been co-opted into all this as a sort of increasingly dog- eared calling card. Thankfully it’s such a work of genius it transcends them all. Not to mention its use as the European anthem… but let’s not go there
The staggeringly meagre number of samples illustrated was pretty dire, considering the huge (deserved) discography this work has to its credit.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by visualnickmos View PostI stand by my contention; the objective of BaL (as I understand it) is to survey a broadish sampling of recordings, and find one (pointless exercise, these days) that is a 'library choice.' Of curse there is a place for historical, intellectual and so on, but that is another programme surely.
The staggeringly meagre number of samples illustrated was pretty dire, considering the huge (deserved) discography this work has to its credit.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gradus View PostI agree with your position but given the enormous number of recordings wouldn't it be easier to tell us in advance which ones are under consideration. Plainly we'd still complain about our favourites or celebrated recordings being omitted but that would add an extra level of debate especially if the BAL team was able to include at least one listeners' favourite in the recordings discussed.
I go back to one of my earlier comments in another thread, about the relevance or otherwise of a BaL in its current 'one recording fits all' format for the winner, or whatever superlative one chooses.
Comment
-
-
A good first choice I thought. The BPO are playing beautifully these days, a renaissance, perhaps?
Excellent contextualisation (German performance tradition).
Surprised Schmidt-Isserstedt missing from the Furtwängler-Karajan Teutonic hegemony (and also surprised Cluytens not mentioned at all, or was he? I was undertaking some chores while listening so may have missed it).
I shall go hunting on Pristine for some remastered wartime Furtwängler.
Jordi Savall the finest of the moderns, in my opinion (Norrington always having something vital to say, too).
A very good broadcast, I'd say.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Gargoyle View PostA good first choice I thought. The BPO are playing beautifully these days, a renaissance, perhaps?
Excellent contextualisation (German performance tradition).
Surprised Schmidt-Isserstedt missing from the Furtwängler-Karajan Teutonic hegemony (and also surprised Cluytens not mentioned at all, or was he? I was undertaking some chores while listening so may have missed it).
I shall go hunting on Pristine for some remastered wartime Furtwängler.
Jordi Savall the finest of the moderns, in my opinion (Norrington always having something vital to say, too).
A very good broadcast, I'd say.
Comment
-
-
I've only just got around to listening to the full broadcast. Why can't TS slow down at bit (or perhaps a lot!)? He's so tiring to listen to when he can't keep up with himself, gasping and stuttering, even when much of what he has so say makes sense.
I do wonder how reviewers select their shortlists. Sometimes, I think they either toss a coin, or at best, look through the list, and say "Hmm, that one looks interesting".
Comment
-
Comment