BaL 25.06.22 - Rachmaninov: Symphony no 2

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gradus
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 5622

    Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
    Gosh I would get a copy of the Previn to supplement it . Its fabulous . I have found a cheap RCA CD of the uncut Ormandy online and look forward to its arrival.
    Perhaps I should have added that I haven't bought CDs for some years and listen mostly to R3 and streaming, thus have heard and enjoyed a number of other Rach 2 recordings.

    Comment

    • jayne lee wilson
      Banned
      • Jul 2011
      • 10711

      Surprised that Rozhdestvensky gets comparatively little attention for No.2, as his LSO version, spectacularly recorded in All Saints Tooting is just overwhelming. IM in G-1/89 rated it as easily a match for Previn or Ashenkazy; JJ concurred on the reissue in 2005. I would prefer it to either, for sound as well as highly individual but always convincing musical sense. Rozh creates an orchestral character with the best of both Russian and Western worlds and - wow! Strings full, gutty and muscular, primary winds, stunning brasses - blazingly prominent but cleanly articulated.

      You even get the collector's-item exposition repeat, in a 24'30 first movement. We're past 13' before the development begins... But believe me, you won't complain, craving more, again, as it flows into view...

      Glorious account available on Regis, and sounding wonderful on Qobuz tonight....
      Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 04-04-23, 01:52.

      Comment

      • Lordgeous
        Full Member
        • Dec 2012
        • 831

        I wonder what he'll think of the new John Wilson recording? Anyone have it?

        Comment

        • Nick Armstrong
          Host
          • Nov 2010
          • 26572

          Originally posted by Lordgeous View Post
          I wonder what he'll think of the new John Wilson recording? Anyone have it?
          Posted this on the New Releases thread:

          Originally posted by Nick Armstrong View Post
          The new Rachmaninov 2nd Symphony from John Wilson and the Sinfonia of London sounds like a cracker, judging by the second movement played yesterday morning Great balance of impetus and expression. Set up for a full listen asap
          Did you hear Saturday’s CD Review? The movement was played during the first half-hour of the programme.
          "...the isle is full of noises,
          Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
          Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
          Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

          Comment

          • Bryn
            Banned
            • Mar 2007
            • 24688

            Originally posted by Nick Armstrong View Post
            Posted this on the New Releases thread:



            Did you hear Saturday’s CD Review? The movement was played during the first half-hour of the programme.
            I might have to reconsider my antipathy towards Wilson's approach to rhythm. That Allegro Molto was, indeed, rather well done.

            Comment

            • jayne lee wilson
              Banned
              • Jul 2011
              • 10711

              Originally posted by Lordgeous View Post
              I wonder what he'll think of the new John Wilson recording? Anyone have it?
              Review here with comparisons... someone else who loves the Rozh as much as I do.... (and a link to someone else who, well, doesn't quite..but I think Quinn misses the point of Rozh's measured tempi in the scherzo: it allows greater contrast with the faster middle section, which is all the more dramatic as a result... brilliantly done by the LSO)..


              But I'd be surprised if any listener comes away from hearing Gennadi and the LSO in their soaringest of full flights without feeling at least some sense of awe; if any piece depends on its sheer sound, this one does; and the Regis has a wonderful realisation of it: warm, full, sensuous where apt, but textural depth and very clear-cut phrasing too.

              Reminds me a little of Paray in Detroit - only better still, and without cuts...and as for the adagio - what a climax...!! I never heard it more overwhelming .....
              Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 04-04-23, 02:45.

              Comment

              • Barbirollians
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 11751

                Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View Post
                Review here with comparisons... someone else who loves the Rozh as much as I do.... (and a link to someone else who, well, doesn't quite..but I think Quinn misses the point of Rozh's measured tempi in the scherzo: it allows greater contrast with the faster middle section, which is all the more dramatic as a result... brilliantly done by the LSO)..


                But I'd be surprised if any listener comes away from hearing Gennadi and the LSO in their soaringest of full flights without feeling at least some sense of awe; if any piece depends on its sheer sound, this one does; and the Regis has a wonderful realisation of it: warm, full, sensuous where apt, but textural depth and very clear-cut phrasing too.

                Reminds me a little of Paray in Detroit - only better still, and without cuts...and as for the adagio - what a climax...!! I never heard it more overwhelming .....
                Rozhdestvensky is excellent and even makes the best possible case for the first movement repeat- LSO again . I had it on cassette and then CD from Pickwick . His Tchaikovsky 5 from the same label is pretty fab too.

                Comment

                • Barbirollians
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 11751

                  Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                  I might have to reconsider my antipathy towards Wilson's approach to rhythm. That Allegro Molto was, indeed, rather well done.
                  I suppose given the Philadelphia sound , Hollywood film music elements of Rachmaninov 2 it may be that Wilson's experience of film music comes into play . I was not at all taken with his raved about French music disc - sounded rather slick and soulless to me.

                  Comment

                  • Alison
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 6468

                    Not much depth of feeling in the John Wilson Rach 2 IMHO. Some well observed detail, particularly in the strings, but it’s all a little bland. I agree (ii) is the best movement - and (iv) the worst.

                    Comment

                    • Eine Alpensinfonie
                      Host
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 20572

                      Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
                      ... Hollywood film music elements of Rachmaninov 2 it may be that Wilson's experience of film music comes into play.
                      Surely it's the other way round? Rachmaninov 2 dates from 1908, long before the film world absorbed his style.

                      Comment

                      • Barbirollians
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 11751

                        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                        Surely it's the other way round? Rachmaninov 2 dates from 1908, long before the film world absorbed his style.
                        What I meant was because of the influence Rachmaninov’s music seems to have had on Hollywood film music in its lush late romanticism that would be familiar to Wilson who is renowned for conducting those scores . By the sounds of Alison’s review not enough though.

                        Comment

                        • Barbirollians
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 11751

                          Thanks for the recommendation of Ormandy’s late RCA Rachmaninov 2 from 1973.

                          There may be better remasterings . The secondhand CD is in the RCA Victrola series from 1989 and there is some glare especially in the upper strings in the finale but what a full hearted lovely account it is . It does not quite shift the 1972 Previn out of my first place but is a recording I am now very glad to have.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X